ReviewSurgery (Oxford, Oxfordshire)2020
Choosing the new normal for surgical education using alternative platforms.
Review in Surgery (Oxford, Oxfordshire), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Role of Patient Education in Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: A Systematic Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025Pooled it
- Surgical Phase Duration in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: A Surgical Data Science Exploration for Clinical Relevance.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Undergraduate Skills Training in Pandemic Times: Where Is the Future of Medical Education?European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2023Article
- Evaluation of the effectiveness of online education in anatomy for medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic.Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft · 2022Article
- Augmented Reality: Moving Robotics Forward.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2021Review
- Building a virtual summer research experience in cancer for high school and early undergraduate students: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic.BMC medical education · 2021Article
- Visual abstract for Abdominal Radiology: what it is, why we need it and how to make it.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2021Article
- Development of a tailor-made surgical online learning platform, ensuring surgical education in times of the COVID19 pandemic.BMC surgery · 2021Article
- Article
- Educational Utility of Social Media for Laparoscopic Surgery in India: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Popular Indian Communities on Facebook.Advances in medical education and practice · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The traditional methods for surgical education and professional development are changing, from a variety of external factors. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the pace innovative alternative tools are introduced into clinical practice, creating a new normal for teaching and training. In this new normal is the challenge to create durable changes for the future of surgical education. Social media (SoMe), a tool that uses electronic communications and applications to allow users create and share information in dynamic ways, can meet this challenge. SoMe is reshaping how we communicate and learn, and offers great benefits for effective, individualized surgical education. The limits for SoMe appear endless, and elements have already help establish digital surgery to help improve the precision and outcomes of surgery. As we work to define the new normal in surgical education and professional development, SoMe digital surgery will be critical for continued growth and progress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.