Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32904157›Full record

ArticleData in brief2020

Dataset of active avoidance in Wistar-Kyoto and Sprague Dawley rats: Experimental data and reinforcement learning model code and output.

John Palmieri, Kevin M Spiegler, Kevin C H Pang, Catherine E Myers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John PalmieriRutgers New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers Biomedical Health Sciences, 185 South Orange Avenue, Newark, NJ 07103, USA.
Kevin M SpieglerRutgers New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers Biomedical Health Sciences, 185 South Orange Avenue, Newark, NJ 07103, USA.
Kevin C H PangRutgers School of Graduate Studies, Rutgers Biomedical Health Sciences, 185 South Orange Avenue, Newark, NJ 07103, USA.
Catherine E MyersRutgers School of Graduate Studies, Rutgers Biomedical Health Sciences, 185 South Orange Avenue, Newark, NJ 07103, USA.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Impaired attention & hippocampal dysfunction in developing abnormal avoidanceI01BX000132 · VA · VA NEW JERSEY HEALTH CARE SYSTEM · PI PANG, KEVIN C.H. · 2009 to 2019
–
CTBI: Traumatic brain injury-induced inflammation effects on cognitive evaluations and response inhibition: Mechanisms of increased risk for suicidalityI01BX004561 · VA · VA NEW JERSEY HEALTH CARE SYSTEM · PI BECK, KEVIN D. · 2020 to 2025
–
Neurocognitive markers of short-term risk for suicidal behavior in high-risk VeteransI01CX001826 · VA · VA NEW JERSEY HEALTH CARE SYSTEM · PI MYERS, CATHERINE E · 2019 to 2024
–
BLRD VA I01 BX000132BLRD VA I01 BX004561CSRD VA I01 CX001826
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data were collected from 40 Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) and 40 Sprague Dawley (SD) rats during an active escape-avoidance experiment. Footshock could be avoided by pressing a lever during a danger period prior to onset of shock. If avoidance did not occur, a series of footshocks was administered, and the rat could press a lever to escape (terminate shocks). For each animal, data were simplified to the presence or absence of lever press and stimuli in each 12-second time frame. Using the pre-processed dataset, a reinforcement learning (RL) model, based on an actor-critic architecture, was utilized to estimate several different model parameters that best characterized each rat's behaviour during the experiment. Once individual model parameters were determined for all 80 rats, behavioural recovery simulations were run using the RL model with each animal's "best-fit" parameters; the simulated behaviour generated avoidance data (percent of trials avoided during a given experimental session) that could be compared across simulated rats, as is customarily done with empirical data. The datasets representing both the experimental data and the model-generated data can be interpreted in various ways to gain further insight into rat behaviour during avoidance and escape learning. Furthermore, the estimated parameters for each individual rat can be compared across groups. Thus, possible between-strain differences in model parameters can be detected, which might provide insights into strain differences in learning. The software implementing the RL model can also be applied to or serve as a template for other experiments involving acquisition learning.

Indexed as

Avoidance learningComputational biologyComputational modellingNeurosciencesReinforcement learningStrain differencesWistar Kyoto rat

Identifiers

PMID32904157
PMCPMC7451822
OpenAlexW3044758143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.