ArticleData in brief2020
A dataset of chest X-ray reports annotated with Spatial Role Labeling annotations.
Article in Data in brief, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- TECRR: a benchmark dataset of radiological reports for BI-RADS classification with machine learning, deep learning, and large language model baselines.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- A Hybrid Deep Learning Approach for Spatial Trigger Extraction from Radiology Reports.Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this paper, we present a dataset consisting of 2000 chest X-ray reports (available as part of the Open-i image search platform) annotated with spatial information. The annotation is based on Spatial Role Labeling. The information includes annotating a radiographic finding, its associated anatomical location, any potential diagnosis described in connection to the spatial relation (between finding and location), and any hedging phrase used to describe the certainty level of a finding/diagnosis. All these annotations are identified with reference to a spatial expression (or Spatial Indicator) that triggers a spatial relation in a sentence. The spatial roles used to encode the spatial information are Trajector, Landmark, Diagnosis, and Hedge. In total, there are 1962 Spatial Indicators (mainly prepositions). There are 2293 Trajectors, 2167 Landmarks, 455 Diagnosis, and 388 Hedges in the dataset. This annotated dataset can be used for developing automatic approaches targeted toward spatial information extraction from radiology reports which then can be applied to numerous clinical applications. We utilize this dataset to develop deep learning-based methods for automatically extracting the Spatial Indicators as well as the associated spatial roles [1].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.