ArticleInternational cancer conference journal2020
A rare case of esophageal adenocarcinoma with urinary bladder metastasis.
Article in International cancer conference journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Unraveling the causality between gastroesophageal reflux disease and increased cancer risk: evidence from the UK Biobank and GWAS consortia.BMC medicine · 2024Article
- Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: An Unusual Pericardial and Pulmonary Metastasis - A Case Report.Case reports in oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 75-year-old man was admitted to our hospital for treatment of esophageal cancer (EC) in March 2017. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed Barrett's esophagus and superficial, distal EC (type 0-IIc). Tumor biopsy showed esophageal adenocarcinoma. Computed tomography revealed no lymph node metastasis but did reveal a 19-mm tumor on the right side of the urinary bladder. Bladder cancer (BC) was also suspected, and the patient underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for EC and transurethral resection of the bladder tumor. The pathological diagnosis of EC was moderately to poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (tub2), pT1b (SM), ly0, v0. The pathological horizontal margin was negative and the vertical margin was positive. Additional esophagectomy and lymph node dissection were indicated for curability. Esophagectomy was difficult because the patient had severe cardiovascular disease, so follow-up observation was adopted. BC was classified as urothelial carcinoma Ta, ly0, v0. After 32 months, multiple tumors were found in the bladder, and BC recurrence was suspected. Transurethral resection of the bladder was performed again for seven tumors, and pathological diagnosis was poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (tub2). The immunohistochemical features matched those of EC. We diagnosed EC metastasis in the urinary bladder. Bladder adenocarcinoma is difficult to distinguish from metastasis from other organs, especially the upper gastrointestinal tract, and cytomorphological features and appropriate clinical history are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.