ReviewEuropean thyroid journal2020
Computer-Aided Diagnosis Systems in Diagnosing Malignant Thyroid Nodules on Ultrasonography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in European thyroid journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with other imaging techniques in differentiating benign and malignant thyroid nodules: a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence Performance in Image-Based Cancer Identification: Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- A comparison of artificial intelligence versus radiologists in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules using ultrasonography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Ultrasound-based deep learning using the VGGNet model for the differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: A meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Review
- Artificial intelligence in clinical physiology: System-wise applications in diagnostics, monitoring, and medical education.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Article
- Breast cancer detection and classification with digital breast tomosynthesis: a two-stage deep learning approach.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2025Article
- Article
- Artificial intelligence assisted diagnosis of early tc markers and its application.Discover oncology · 2024Review
- Thyroid ultrasound and its ancillary techniques.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2024Review
- A Novel Deep-Learning-Based CADx Architecture for Classification of Thyroid Nodules Using Ultrasound Images.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2023Article
- Generative Adversarial Network (Generative Artificial Intelligence) in Pediatric Radiology: A Systematic Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Review
- Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Detection and Diagnosis in Pediatric Radiology: A Systematic Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Evaluation of artificial intelligence techniques in disease diagnosis and prediction.Discover artificial intelligence · 2023Review
- Review
- The Future of Thyroid Nodule Risk Stratification.Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America · 2022Review
- Clinicopathological and Molecular Features of Secondary Cancer (Metastasis) to the Thyroid and Advances in Management.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Machine intelligence in non-invasive endocrine cancer diagnostics.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2022Review
- Quality assessment standards in artificial intelligence diagnostic accuracy systematic reviews: a meta-research study.NPJ digital medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComputer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems are being applied to the ultrasonographic diagnosis of malignant thyroid nodules, but it remains controversial whether the systems add any accuracy for radiologists.
objectiveTo determine the accuracy of CAD systems in diagnosing malignant thyroid nodules.
methodsPubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies on the diagnostic performance of CAD systems. The diagnostic performance was assessed by pooled sensitivity and specificity, and their accuracy was compared with that of radiologists. The present systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019134460).
resultsNineteen studies with 4,781 thyroid nodules were included. Both the classic machine learning- and the deep learning-based CAD system had good performance in diagnosing malignant thyroid nodules (classic machine learning: sensitivity 0.86 [95% CI 0.79-0.92], specificity 0.85 [95% CI 0.77-0.91], diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) 37.41 [95% CI 24.91-56.20]; deep learning: sensitivity 0.89 [95% CI 0.81-0.93], specificity 0.84 [95% CI 0.75-0.90], DOR 40.87 [95% CI 18.13-92.13]). The diagnostic performance of the deep learning-based CAD system was comparable to that of the radiologists (sensitivity 0.87 [95% CI 0.78-0.93] vs. 0.87 [95% CI 0.85-0.89], specificity 0.85 [95% CI 0.76-0.91] vs. 0.87 [95% CI 0.81-0.91], DOR 40.12 [95% CI 15.58-103.33] vs. DOR 44.88 [95% CI 30.71-65.57]).
conclusionsThe CAD systems demonstrated good performance in diagnosing malignant thyroid nodules. However, experienced radiologists may still have an advantage over CAD systems during real-time diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.