Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32903871›Full record

ReviewDiabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy2020

Current Perspectives on the Impact of the National Diabetes Prevention Program: Building on Successes and Overcoming Challenges.

Natalie D Ritchie, Katherine J W Baucom, Katherine A Sauder

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07392008 (PASO A PASO Pilot Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07392008 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

PASO A PASO Pilot Study: Tailored Diabetes Prevention Program for Spanish-Speaking Communities Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2025 to 2026Enrolled45ConditionsPre DiabeticArmsPaso a Paso
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Lower-Intensity Interventions for Prediabetes: A Systematic Review.American journal of preventive medicine · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Natalie D RitchieAmbulatory Care Services, Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6908-7413
Katherine J W BaucomDepartment of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Katherine A SauderDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8473-8015

Funding

Enhanced enrollment in the National Diabetes Prevention Program for the underserved: a randomized control trialR01DK119478 · NIDDK · DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITAL AUTHORITY · PI PEREIRA, ROCIO INES · 2019 to 2023
$2.8M
Couple-based lifestyle intervention to prevent type 2 diabetesK23DK115820 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI BAUCOM, KATHERINE JANE WILLIAMS · 2018 to 2022
$1.2M
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK115820NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK119478
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To address the public health and economic burden of type 2 diabetes, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) began dissemination of the National Diabetes Prevention Program (NDPP) in the United States in 2010. Based on the intensive lifestyle intervention from a large efficacy trial, the NDPP aims to reduce incidence through lifestyle change and weight loss. This narrative review summarizes evidence on reach, effectiveness, and sustainability of the NDPP, while highlighting opportunities to overcome challenges in these areas. Major successes include reaching hundreds of thousands of at-risk individuals across the nation, with notable effectiveness upon full participation and widespread insurance coverage. Yet, more work is needed to ensure greater public health impact, particularly among priority populations at heightened risk who also experience disparities in program outcomes. Preliminary evidence suggests a number of strategies may improve reach and effectiveness of the NDPP, often with more rigorous study needed prior to widespread uptake. Updating the NDPP to better match the current evidence-base may also be important, such as directly targeting glycemia with a patient-centered approach and promoting metformin as an adjunct or second-line treatment. Finally, revisiting pay-for-performance reimbursement models may be critical to sustainability by ensuring adequate availability of suppliers and ultimately reducing diabetes prevalence.

Indexed as

lifestyle modificationobesityprediabetespreventiontype 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID32903871
PMCPMC7445538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.