What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Population analyses reveal heterogenous encoding in the medial prefrontal cortex during naturalistic foraging.eLife · 2026
   Article
2. Hierarchical organization of the forebrain cholinergic system in rats.iScience · 2025
   Article
3. Functional architecture of the forebrain cholinergic system in rodents.Research square · 2024
   Article
4. Nonlinear relationship between CAN current andCognitive neurodynamics · 2022
   Article
5. Identification of adult spinal Shox2 neuronal subpopulations based on unbiased computational clustering of electrophysiological properties.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2022
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as