Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32903729›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2020

Metagenomic Profiling and Microbial Metabolic Potential of Perdido Fold Belt (NW) and Campeche Knolls (SE) in the Gulf of Mexico.

Luciana Raggi, Fernando García-Guevara, E Ernestina Godoy-Lozano, Adrian Martínez-Santana, Alejandra Escobar-Zepeda, Rosa María Gutierrez-Rios, Antonio Loza, Enrique Merino, Alejandro Sanchez-Flores, Alexei Licea-Navarro and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Luciana RaggiInstituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Fernando García-GuevaraInstituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
E Ernestina Godoy-LozanoInstituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Adrian Martínez-SantanaInstituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Alejandra Escobar-ZepedaInstituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Rosa María Gutierrez-RiosInstituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Antonio LozaInstituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Enrique MerinoInstituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Alejandro Sanchez-FloresInstituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Alexei Licea-NavarroLaboratorio de Inmunología Molecular y Biotoxinas, Departamento de Innovación Biomedica, CICESE, Ensenada, Mexico.
Liliana Pardo-LopezInstituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Lorenzo SegoviaInstituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Katy JuarezInstituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXCenter for Scientific Research and Higher Education at Ensenada · MXInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Gulf of Mexico (GoM) is a particular environment that is continuously exposed to hydrocarbon compounds that may influence the microbial community composition. We carried out a metagenomic assessment of the bacterial community to get an overall view of this geographical zone. We analyzed both taxonomic and metabolic markers profiles to explain how the indigenous GoM microorganims participate in the biogeochemical cycling. Two geographically distant regions in the GoM, one in the north-west (NW) and one in the south-east (SE) of the GoM were analyzed and showed differences in their microbial composition and metabolic potential. These differences provide evidence the delicate equilibrium that sustains microbial communities and biogeochemical cycles. Based on the taxonomy and gene groups, the NW are more oxic sediments than SE ones, which have anaerobic conditions. Both water and sediments show the expected sulfur, nitrogen, and hydrocarbon metabolism genes, with particularly high diversity of the hydrocarbon-degrading ones. Accordingly, many of the assigned genera were associated with hydrocarbon degradation processes,

Indexed as

bacterial community structureGulf of Mexicohydrocarbon degradationmetabolic potentialmetagenome

Identifiers

PMID32903729
PMCPMC7438803
OpenAlexW3048679231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.