Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32903691›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in human neuroscience2020

The Role of Gesture in Communication and Cognition: Implications for Understanding and Treating Neurogenic Communication Disorders.

Sharice Clough, Melissa C Duff

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
13.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Aberrant gesture use in autism spectrum disorders is unrelated to motor abnormalities.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. Network-oriented neurorehabilitation after stroke: a paradigmatic approach.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Infants who develop autism show smaller inventories of deictic and symbolic gestures at 12 months of age.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sharice CloughCommunication and Memory Lab, Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
Melissa C DuffCommunication and Memory Lab, Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Language processing in context in individuals with Alzheimer’s diseaseR01DC017926 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Sarah Brown-Schmidt, Melissa C Duff · 2020 to 2026
$5.2M
Language processing and the hippocampal declarative memory systemR01DC011755 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BROWN-SCHMIDT, SARAH, DUFF, MELISSA C · 2012 to 2016
$1.9M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011755NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When people talk, they gesture. Gesture is a fundamental component of language that contributes meaningful and unique information to a spoken message and reflects the speaker's underlying knowledge and experiences. Theoretical perspectives of speech and gesture propose that they share a common conceptual origin and have a tightly integrated relationship, overlapping in time, meaning, and function to enrich the communicative context. We review a robust literature from the field of psychology documenting the benefits of gesture for communication for both speakers and listeners, as well as its important cognitive functions for organizing spoken language, and facilitating problem-solving, learning, and memory. Despite this evidence, gesture has been relatively understudied in populations with neurogenic communication disorders. While few studies have examined the rehabilitative potential of gesture in these populations, others have ignored gesture entirely or even discouraged its use. We review the literature characterizing gesture production and its role in intervention for people with aphasia, as well as describe the much sparser literature on gesture in cognitive communication disorders including right hemisphere damage, traumatic brain injury, and Alzheimer's disease. The neuroanatomical and behavioral profiles of these patient populations provide a unique opportunity to test theories of the relationship of speech and gesture and advance our understanding of their neural correlates. This review highlights several gaps in the field of communication disorders which may serve as a bridge for applying the psychological literature of gesture to the study of language disorders. Such future work would benefit from considering theoretical perspectives of gesture and using more rigorous and quantitative empirical methods in its approaches. We discuss implications for leveraging gesture to explore its untapped potential in understanding and rehabilitating neurogenic communication disorders.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseaphasiacognitioncommunicationgesturelanguageright hemisphere damagetraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID32903691
PMCPMC7438760
OpenAlexW3048577018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.