Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32903686›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2020

Hop Extract: An Efficacious Antimicrobial and Anti-biofilm Agent Against Multidrug-Resistant Staphylococci Strains and

Silvia Di Lodovico, Luigi Menghini, Claudio Ferrante, Erica Recchia, Juliana Castro-Amorim, Paula Gameiro, Luigina Cellini, Lucinda J Bessa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Determinants of Antibacterial Activity inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. STITCH and Molecular Docking Analysis of Selected Wood Apple (Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024
    Article
  12. The Antimicrobial Potential of the Hop (Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. An Updated Review of the GenusPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Silvia Di LodovicoDipartimento di Farmacia, Università degli Studi "Gabriele d'Annunzio" Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Luigi MenghiniDipartimento di Farmacia, Università degli Studi "Gabriele d'Annunzio" Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Claudio FerranteDipartimento di Farmacia, Università degli Studi "Gabriele d'Annunzio" Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Erica RecchiaDipartimento di Farmacia, Università degli Studi "Gabriele d'Annunzio" Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Juliana Castro-AmorimLAQV/REQUIMTE, Departamento de Química e Bioquímica, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Paula GameiroLAQV/REQUIMTE, Departamento de Química e Bioquímica, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Luigina CelliniDipartimento di Farmacia, Università degli Studi "Gabriele d'Annunzio" Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Lucinda J BessaLAQV/REQUIMTE, Departamento de Química e Bioquímica, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteria belonging to

Indexed as

antibacterial activityantibiofilm activityantimicrobial resistancebiocompatibilityhop extractStaphylococcus spp. and Cutibacterium acnes

Identifiers

PMID32903686
PMCPMC7438819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.