Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32903653›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2020

Predict Ki-67 Positive Cells in H&E-Stained Images Using Deep Learning Independently From IHC-Stained Images.

Yiqing Liu, Xi Li, Aiping Zheng, Xihan Zhu, Shuting Liu, Mengying Hu, Qianjiang Luo, Huina Liao, Mubiao Liu, Yonghong He and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ki-67 assessment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Systematic review and meta-analysis of manual vs. digital pathology scoring.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Yiqing LiuDepartment of Life and Health, Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Shenzhen, China.
Xi LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Aiping ZhengDepartment of Pathology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Xihan ZhuSchool of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Shuting LiuDepartment of Life and Health, Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Shenzhen, China.
Mengying HuDepartment of Life and Health, Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Shenzhen, China.
Qianjiang LuoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Huina LiaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Mubiao LiuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Yonghong HeDepartment of Life and Health, Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Shenzhen, China.
Yupeng ChenPeng Cheng Laboratory, Shenzhen, China.
Peking University Shenzhen Hospital · CNTsinghua–Berkeley Shenzhen Institute · CNCapital Medical University · CNGuangdong Provincial People's Hospital · CNPeng Cheng Laboratory · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo obtain molecular information in slides directly from H&E staining slides, which apparently display morphological information, to show that some differences in molecular level have already encoded in morphology.

methodsIn this paper, we selected Ki-67-expression as the representative of molecular information. We proposed a method that can predict Ki-67 positive cells directly from H&E stained slides by a deep convolutional network model. To train this model, we constructed a dataset containing Ki-67 negative or positive cell images and background images. These images were all extracted from H&E stained WSIs and the Ki-67 expression was acquired from the corresponding IHC stained WSIs. The trained model was evaluated both on classification performance and the ability to quantify Ki-67 expression in H&E stained images.

resultsThe model achieved an average accuracy of 0.9371 in discrimination of Ki-67 negative cell images, positive cell images and background images. As for evaluation of quantification performance, the correlation coefficient between the quantification results of H&E stained images predicted by our model and that of IHC stained images obtained by color channel filtering is 0.80. CONCLUSION AND SIGNIFICANCE: Our study indicates that the deep learning model has a good performance both on prediction of Ki-67 positive cells and quantification of Ki-67 expression in cancer samples stained by H&E. More generally, this study shows that deep learning is a powerful tool in exploring the relationship between morphological information and molecular information. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The main program is available at https://github.com/liuyiqing2018/predict_Ki-67_from_HE.

Indexed as

deep learningdigital pathologyfully convolutional networkimmunohistochemistryKi-67neuroendocrine tumor

Identifiers

PMID32903653
PMCPMC7438787
OpenAlexW3046972299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.