Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32903652›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2020

Impact of Brain Surface Boundary Conditions on Electrophysiology and Implications for Electrocorticography.

Nicholas Rogers, Martin Thunemann, Anna Devor, Vikash Gilja

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. [Research progress and application of transfer entropy algorithm].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2022
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicholas RogersDepartment of Physics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Martin ThunemannDepartment of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Anna DevorDepartment of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Vikash GiljaElectrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.

Funding

MICROSCOPIC FOUNDATION OF MULTIMODAL HUMAN IMAGINGR01MH111359 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DALE, ANDERS M, DEVOR, ANNA · 2016 to 2020
$5.6M
Neuronal, glial and BOLD fMRI signals: From BOLD to 2-photon microscopyR01NS057198 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DEVOR, ANNA · 2009 to 2017
$2.6M
Effects of intrinsic and drug-induced neuromodulation on functional brain imagingR01DA050159 · NIDA · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI DEVOR, ANNA · 2020 to 2024
$1.9M
Multiphoton imaging and uncaging system with a capability of simultaneous electroS10RR029050 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DALE, ANDERS M · 2010 to 2010
$870k
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR029050NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA050159NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111359NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS057198
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Volume conduction of electrical potentials in the brain is highly influenced by the material properties and geometry of the tissue and recording devices implanted into the tissue. These effects are very large in EEG due to the volume conduction through the skull and scalp but are often neglected in intracranial electrophysiology. When considering penetrating electrodes deep in the brain, the assumption of an infinite and homogenous medium can be used when the sources are far enough from the brain surface and the electrodes to minimize the boundary effect. When the electrodes are recording from the brain's surface the effect of the boundary cannot be neglected, and the large surface area and commonly used insulating materials in surface electrode arrays may further increase the effect by altering the nature of the boundary in the immediate vicinity of the electrodes. This gives the experimenter some control over the spatial profiles of the potentials by appropriate design of the electrode arrays. We construct a simple three-layer model to describe the effect of material properties and geometry above the brain surface on the electric potentials and conduct empirical experiments to validate this model. A laminar electrode array is used to measure the effect of insulating and relatively conducting layers above the cortical surface by recording evoked potentials alternating between a dried surface and saline covering layer, respectively. Empirically, we find that an insulating boundary amplifies the potentials relative to conductive saline by about a factor of 4, and that the effect is not constrained to potentials that originate near the surface. The model is applied to predict the influence of array design and implantation procedure on the recording amplitude and spatial selectivity of the surface electrode arrays.

Indexed as

biophysicsdevice fabricationelectrocorticography (ECoG)electrophysiologyneuroscience method

Identifiers

PMID32903652
PMCPMC7438758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.