Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32903631›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2020

Large Animal Models in Regenerative Medicine and Tissue Engineering: To Do or Not to Do.

Iris Ribitsch, Pedro M Baptista, Anna Lange-Consiglio, Luca Melotti, Marco Patruno, Florien Jenner, Eva Schnabl-Feichter, Luke C Dutton, David J Connolly, Frank G van Steenbeek and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 153 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
153citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

153 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 225 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. A standardised and reproducible method forAnnals of translational medicine · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Evaluation of Short-Term Stall Size Housing on the Behavior and Welfare of Domestic Horses (Equus caballus).Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2026
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

93 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Iris RibitschVeterm, Department for Companion Animals and Horses, University Equine Hospital, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Pedro M BaptistaLaboratory of Organ Bioengineering and Regenerative Medicine, Health Research Institute of Aragon (IIS Aragon), Zaragoza, Spain.
Anna Lange-ConsiglioDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Luca MelottiDepartment of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Marco PatrunoDepartment of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Florien JennerVeterm, Department for Companion Animals and Horses, University Equine Hospital, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Eva Schnabl-FeichterClinical Unit of Small Animal Surgery, Department for Companion Animals and Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Luke C DuttonDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Services, Royal Veterinary College, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
David J ConnollyClinical Unit of Small Animal Surgery, Department for Companion Animals and Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Frank G van SteenbeekDepartment of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Jayesh DudhiaDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Services, Royal Veterinary College, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
Louis C PenningDepartment of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · ATRoyal Veterinary College · GBUniversity of Padua · ITUtrecht University · NLInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón · ESUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/J006815/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid developments in Regenerative Medicine and Tissue Engineering has witnessed an increasing drive toward clinical translation of breakthrough technologies. However, the progression of promising preclinical data to achieve successful clinical market authorisation remains a bottleneck. One hurdle for progress to the clinic is the transition from small animal research to advanced preclinical studies in large animals to test safety and efficacy of products. Notwithstanding this, to draw meaningful and reliable conclusions from animal experiments it is critical that the species and disease model of choice is relevant to answer the research question as well as the clinical problem. Selecting the most appropriate animal model requires in-depth knowledge of specific species and breeds to ascertain the adequacy of the model and outcome measures that closely mirror the clinical situation. Traditional reductionist approaches in animal experiments, which often do not sufficiently reflect the studied disease, are still the norm and can result in a disconnect in outcomes observed between animal studies and clinical trials. To address these concerns a reconsideration in approach will be required. This should include a stepwise approach using

Indexed as

doghorselarge animal modelsnaturally occurring diseasepigregenerative medicinesheeptissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID32903631
PMCPMC7438731
OpenAlexW3049538137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.