Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32903608›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2020

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Mediastinal Masses in Cats: A Retrospective Study.

Serena Bernardi, Valeria Martini, Stefano Perfetto, Marzia Cozzi, Stefano Comazzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Successful management of feline CD4Veterinarni medicina · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Serena BernardiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Milan, Lodi, Italy.
Valeria MartiniDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Milan, Lodi, Italy.
Stefano PerfettoBiessea Veterinary Laboratory, Milan, Italy.
Marzia CozziDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Milan, Lodi, Italy.
Stefano ComazziDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Milan, Lodi, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mediastinal masses occur in dogs and cats and are often investigated with cytology. However, discrimination between the two most common lesions (thymoma and lymphoma) may be challenging, especially when small/medium lymphocytes represent the prevalent population. The aim of the present study is to describe the flow cytometric aspects of mediastinal masses in cats and to assess the ability of flow cytometry (FC) to differentiate lymphoma from non-lymphomatous lesions. We retrospectively describe FC features of fine needle aspiration cytology from cats with mediastinal masses. Cases were grouped in lymphoma and non-lymphoma based on results of cytology, histopathology, PCR for antigen receptor rearrangement (PARR), clinical presentation, and follow-up. Scatter properties, positivities to CD5, CD4, CD8, CD21, CD18, and their co-expressions were recorded using a multicolour approach. Twenty cats were included, 12 lymphomas and eight non-lymphomatous cases. Forward scatter (FSC) of lymphoid cells was higher in the lymphoma group. Double positive CD4+CD8+ T-cells were the dominant population in eight out of 12 lymphomas, whereas non-lymphomatous lesions showed no dominant lymphoid population in five out of eight cases. Unlike dogs, the high prevalence of CD4+CD8+ lymphomas in cats it makes difficult to differentiate lymphoma from non-lymphomatous lesions using FC alone. FC may add interesting information to refine diagnosis in some cases, but PARR and histopathology remain mandatory to solve differential in case of expansion of small-medium sized double positive lymphoid cells.

Indexed as

catflow cytometrylymphomamediastinal massesthymocytes

Identifiers

PMID32903608
PMCPMC7438742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.