ArticleFrontiers in genetics2020
Management of Genetic Diversity in the Era of Genomics.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uncertainty-aware breeding decisions: MCMC-based optimum contribution selection increases breeding decision robustness.Genetics · 2026Article
- The effect of selection on allele frequencies and diversity in wheat (Triticum aestivum).TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven advancements in agricultural biotechnology.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026Review
- Targeted allele frequency tuning in breeding populations via alternative optimum contribution selection.Genetics · 2026Article
- Genomic selection strategies and their potential to maintain rare alleles and de-novo mutations: a long-term assessment.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- Linkage- and ROH-based genomic relationship matrices for IBD based management of genetic diversity.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- Genomic estimates of Identity-By-Descent relationships in large scale data sets.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- Probabilities of two alleles being identity by state at unobserved loci predicted by observed loci in cattle populations.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Genomics and phenomics: Who will be the dairy cows of the future?JDS communications · 2025Review
- A Similarity Matrix for Preserving Haplotype Diversity Amongst Parents in Genomic Selection.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2025Article
- Estimating Linkage Disequilibrium and Effective Population Size Across Generations in Holstein Cattle.Veterinary medicine and science · 2025Article
- A Novel Conservation Genomic Strategy: Selection for the Probability of Offspring Heterozygosity.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Maintenance of genetic diversity in subdivided populations using genomic coancestry matrices.Molecular ecology resources · 2025Article
- Practical Considerations When Using Mendelian Sampling Variances for Selection Decisions in Genomic Selection Programs.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2025Article
- 110 years of rice breeding at LSU: realized genetic gains and future optimization.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Article
- Modern pedigree dogs in the United Kingdom Kennel Club: a journey through shifting population landscapes and demography.Companion animal health and genetics · 2025Article
- Estimation of Inbreeding Depression From Overdominant Loci Using Molecular Markers.Evolutionary applications · 2025Article
- Genomic optimum contribution selection and mate allocation using JuMP.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- Evaluation of genomic mating approach based on genetic algorithms for long-term selection in Huaxi cattle.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Prediction of additive genetic variances of descendants for complex families based on Mendelian sampling variances.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Management of genetic diversity aims to (i) maintain heterozygosity, which ameliorates inbreeding depression and loss of genetic variation at loci that may become of importance in the future; and (ii) avoid genetic drift, which prevents deleterious recessives (e.g., rare disease alleles) from drifting to high frequency, and prevents random drift of (functional) traits. In the genomics era, genomics data allow for many alternative measures of inbreeding and genomic relationships. Genomic relationships/inbreeding can be classified into (i) homozygosity/heterozygosity based (e.g., molecular kinship matrix); (ii) genetic drift-based, i.e., changes of allele frequencies; or (iii) IBD-based, i.e., SNPs are used in linkage analyses to identify IBD segments. Here, alternative measures of inbreeding/relationship were used to manage genetic diversity in genomic optimal contribution (GOC) selection schemes. Contrary to classic inbreeding theory, it was found that drift and homozygosity-based inbreeding could differ substantially in GOC schemes unless diversity management was based upon IBD. When using a homozygosity-based measure of relationship, the inbreeding management resulted in allele frequency changes toward 0.5 giving a low rate of increase in homozygosity for the panel used for management, but not for unmanaged neutral loci, at the expense of a high genetic drift. When genomic relationship matrices were based on drift, following VanRaden and as in GCTA, drift was low at the expense of a high rate of increase in homozygosity. The use of IBD-based relationship matrices for inbreeding management limited both drift and the homozygosity-based rate of inbreeding to their target values. Genetic improvement per percent of inbreeding was highest when GOC used IBD-based relationships irrespective of the inbreeding measure used. Genomic relationships based on runs of homozygosity resulted in very high initial improvement per percent of inbreeding, but also in substantial discrepancies between drift and homozygosity-based rates of inbreeding, and resulted in a drift that exceeded its target value. The discrepancy between drift and homozygosity-based rates of inbreeding was caused by a covariance between initial allele frequency and the subsequent change in frequency, which becomes stronger when using data from whole genome sequence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.