ArticleBMC biomedical engineering2020
Exploring the role of transtibial prosthetic use in deep tissue injury development: a scoping review.
Article in BMC biomedical engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preliminary development and validation of a textile-based pressure-sensing system for lower-limb prosthetic sockets.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Article
- Application of ultrasound to monitor in vivo residual bone movement within transtibial prosthetic sockets.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Quantifying Bone and Skin Movement in the Residual Limb-Socket Interface of Individuals With Transtibial Limb Loss Using Dynamic Stereo X-Ray: Protocol for a Lower Limb Loss Cadaver and Clinical Study.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- An ex vivo animal model to study the effect of transverse mechanical loading on skeletal muscle.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Wound management, healing, and early prosthetic rehabilitation: Part 2 - A scoping review of physical biomarkers.Canadian prosthetics & orthotics journal · 2024Review
- Methodology to Investigate Effect of Prosthetic Interface Design on Residual Limb Soft Tissue Deformation.Canadian prosthetics & orthotics journal · 2023Article
- Analysis of lower limb prosthetic socket interface based on stress and motion measurements.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine · 2022Article
- Air microfluidics-enabled soft robotic transtibial prosthesis socket liner toward dynamic management of residual limb contact pressure and volume fluctuation.Biomicrofluidics · 2022Article
- Volume Fluctuations in Active and Nonactive Transtibial Prosthetics Users.BioMed research international · 2022Article
- The Impact of Limited Prosthetic Socket Documentation: A Researcher Perspective.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2022Article
- Changes in Tissue Composition and Load Response After Transtibial Amputation Indicate Biomechanical Adaptation.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2021Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe soft tissue of the residual limb in transtibial prosthetic users encounters unique biomechanical challenges. Although not intended to tolerate high loads and deformation, it becomes a weight-bearing structure within the residuum-prosthesis-complex. Consequently, deep soft tissue layers may be damaged, resulting in Deep Tissue Injury (DTI). Whilst considerable effort has gone into DTI research on immobilised individuals, only little is known about the aetiology and population-specific risk factors in amputees. This scoping review maps out and critically appraises existing research on DTI in lower-limb prosthetic users according to (1) the population-specific aetiology, (2) risk factors, and (3) methodologies to investigate both.
resultsA systematic search within the databases Pubmed, Ovid Excerpta Medica, and Scopus identified 16 English-language studies. The results indicate that prosthetic users may be at risk for DTI during various loading scenarios. This is influenced by individual surgical, morphological, and physiological determinants, as well as the choice of prosthetic componentry. However, methodological limitations, high inter-patient variability, and small sample sizes complicate the interpretation of outcome measures. Additionally, fundamental research on cell and tissue reactions to dynamic loading and on prosthesis-induced alterations of the vascular and lymphatic supply is missing.
conclusionWe therefore recommend increased interdisciplinary research endeavours with a focus on prosthesis-related experimental design to widen our understanding of DTI. The results have the potential to initiate much-needed clinical advances in surgical and prosthetic practice and inform future pressure ulcer classifications and guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.