Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32903115›Full record

ReviewInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2021

Endovascular treatment of pediatric ischemic stroke: A single center experience and review of the literature.

Isabel Fragata, Teresa Morais, Rita Silva, Ana Paiva Nunes, Petra Loureiro, José Diogo Martins, Jaime Pamplona, Rui Carvalho, Mariana Baptista, João Reis

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Isabel FragataNeuroradiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Central, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7037-7458
Teresa MoraisNeuroradiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Central, Lisboa, Portugal.
Rita SilvaPediatric Neurology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Central, Lisboa, Portugal.
Ana Paiva NunesStroke Unit, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Central, Lisboa, Portugal.
Petra LoureiroPediatric Cardiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Central, Lisboa, Portugal.
José Diogo MartinsPediatric Cardiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Central, Lisboa, Portugal.
Jaime PamplonaNeuroradiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Central, Lisboa, Portugal.
Rui CarvalhoNeuroradiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Central, Lisboa, Portugal.
Mariana BaptistaNeuroradiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Central, Lisboa, Portugal.
João ReisNeuroradiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Central, Lisboa, Portugal.
Unidade Local de Saúde de São José · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMechanical thrombectomy is standard treatment for large vessel occlusion (LVO) in adults. There are no randomized controlled trials for the pediatric population. We report our single-center experience with thrombectomy of LVO in a series of pediatric patients, and perform a review of the literature.

methodsRetrospective review of consecutive pediatric thrombectomy cases between 2011 and 2018. Demographic variables, imaging data, technical aspects and clinical outcome were recorded.

resultsIn a period of 7 years, 7 children were treated for LVO at our center. Median age was 13 (2-17), and median Ped-NIHSS was 15 (3-24), and the median ASPECTS was 8 (2-10). Five patients had cardiac disease, and 2 of them were under external cardiac assistance. Median time from onset of symptoms to beginning of treatment was 7h06m (2h58m-21h38m). Five patients had middle cerebral artery occlusions. Thrombectomy was performed using a stentriever in 3 patients, aspiration in 3 patients, and combined technique in 1 patient. Six patients had good recanalization (TICI 2 b/3). There were no immediate periprocedural complications. At 3 months, 4 patients (57%) were independent (mRS score <3). Two patients died, one after haemorrhagic transformation of an extensive MCA infarct, and one due to extensive brainstem ischemia in the setting of varicella vasculitis. DISCUSSION: Selected pediatric patients with LVO may be treated with mechanical thrombectomy safely. In patients under external cardiac assistance and under anticoagulation, thrombectomy is the only alternative for treatment of LVO. A multidisciplinary approach in specialized pediatric stroke centers with trained neurointerventionalists are essential for good results.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaIschemic StrokeStrokeAdolescentAdultChildHumansRetrospective StudiesThrombectomyTreatment OutcomepaediatricStrokethrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID32903115
PMCPMC7903541
OpenAlexW3083841576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.