Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32903035›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2021

SOLLID - a single centre study to develop methods to investigate the effects of low radiation doses within nuclear medicine, to enable multicentre epidemiological investigations.

Glenn Flux, Iain Murray, Dominic Rushforth, Paul Gape, Carla Abreu, Martin Lee, Ana Ribeiro, Rebecca Gregory, Sarah Chittenden, Jim Thurston and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03580161 (Simplification of Low Level Internal Dosimetry), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03580161 completednot on this map

Simplification of Low Level Internal Dosimetry

TypeobservationalSponsorRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustRan2018 to 2022Enrolled12ConditionsExposure to Medical Diagnostic RadiationArms18-F FDG PET/CT dosimetry scans and measurements, Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT dosimetry scans and measurements, 68-Ga Dotatate PET/CT dosimetry scans and measurements, 99mTc Pertechnetate Thyroid dosimetry scans and measurements, 99mTc DMSA(III) Renal dosimetry scans and measurements
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Glenn FluxDepartment of Physics, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Iain MurrayDepartment of Physics, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Dominic RushforthDepartment of Physics, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Paul GapeDepartment of Physics, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Carla AbreuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, United Kingdom.
Martin LeeDepartment of Physics, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Ana RibeiroDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, United Kingdom.
Rebecca GregoryBarts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Sarah ChittendenDepartment of Physics, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Jim ThurstonDepartment of Physics, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Yong DuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, United Kingdom.
Jonathan GearDepartment of Physics, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Royal Marsden Hospital · GBRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBBarts Health NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is continuing debate concerning the risks of secondary malignancies from low levels of radiation exposure. The current model used for radiation protection is predicated on the assumption that even very low levels of exposure may entail risk. This has profound implications for medical procedures involving ionising radiation as radiation doses must be carefully monitored, and for diagnostic procedures are minimised as far as possible. This incurs considerable expense. The SOLLID study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03580161) aims to develop the methodology to enable a large-scale epidemiological investigation of the effect of radiopharmaceutical administrations to patients undergoing diagnostic nuclear medicine procedures. Patients will undergo a series of scans in addition to that acquired as standard of care to enable the radiation doses delivered to healthy organs to be accurately calculated. Detailed analysis will be performed to determine the uncertainty in the radiation dose calculations as a function of the number and type of scans acquired. It is intended that this will inform a subsequent long-term multicentre epidemiological study that would address the question definitively. Secondary aims of the study are to evaluate the range of absorbed doses that are delivered from diagnostic nuclear medicine procedures and to use current risk models to ascertain the relative risks from these administrations.

Indexed as

Radiation DosageResearch DesignAdultFemaleHumansMaleNuclear MedicineRadiation ExposureRadiation ProtectionRadionuclide ImagingYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32903035
PMCPMC8011250
OpenAlexW3083899956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.