Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32902751›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021

Phytotoxicity, cytotoxicity, and in vivo antifungal efficacy of chitosan nanobiocomposites on prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells.

Alma Carolina Gálvez-Iriqui, Joel Said García-Romo, Mario Onofre Cortez-Rocha, Armando Burgos-Hernández, María Guadalupe Burboa-Zazueta, Ana Guadalupe Luque-Alcaraz, Montserrat Calderón-Santoyo, Waldo Manuel Argüelles-Monal, Maribel Plascencia-Jatomea

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alma Carolina Gálvez-IriquiDepartamento de Investigación y Posgrado en Alimentos, Microbiology and Mycotoxins Laboratory, Blvd. Luis Encinas y Rosales S/N, Col. Centro, 83000, Hermosillo, Sonora, México.
Joel Said García-RomoDepartamento de Investigación y Posgrado en Alimentos, Microbiology and Mycotoxins Laboratory, Blvd. Luis Encinas y Rosales S/N, Col. Centro, 83000, Hermosillo, Sonora, México.
Mario Onofre Cortez-RochaDepartamento de Investigación y Posgrado en Alimentos, Microbiology and Mycotoxins Laboratory, Blvd. Luis Encinas y Rosales S/N, Col. Centro, 83000, Hermosillo, Sonora, México.
Armando Burgos-HernándezDepartamento de Investigación y Posgrado en Alimentos, Microbiology and Mycotoxins Laboratory, Blvd. Luis Encinas y Rosales S/N, Col. Centro, 83000, Hermosillo, Sonora, México.
María Guadalupe Burboa-ZazuetaDepartamento de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas, Cell Biology Laboratory, Blvd. Luis Encinas y Rosales S/N, Col. Centro, 83000, Hermosillo, Sonora, México.
Ana Guadalupe Luque-AlcarazDepartamento de Ingeniería Biomédica, Universidad Estatal de Sonora, Ley Federal del Trabajo S/N, Col. Apolo, 83100, Hermosillo, Sonora, México.
Montserrat Calderón-SantoyoIntegral Laboratory of Food Research, Instituto Tecnológico de Tepic, Avenida Tecnológico 2595, Col. Lagos del Country, 63175, Tepic, Nayarit, México.
Waldo Manuel Argüelles-MonalBiopolymer Laboratory, Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Alimentación, A.C., Carretera Gustavo Enrique Astiazarán Rosas, N0. 46, 83304, Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico.
Maribel Plascencia-JatomeaDepartamento de Investigación y Posgrado en Alimentos, Microbiology and Mycotoxins Laboratory, Blvd. Luis Encinas y Rosales S/N, Col. Centro, 83000, Hermosillo, Sonora, México. maribel.plascencia@unison.mx.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0339-3658
Universidad de Sonora · MXCentro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo · MXInstituto Tecnológico de Tepic · MX

Funding

Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología 219786Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chitosan (CS) nanosystems have potential applications for the control of microorganisms in the medical, environmental, and agrifood fields. In vivo and in vitro assays of CS nanosystems have experienced increased activity due to improved physicochemical properties, biological activity, and reactivity. Hence, it is important to determine whether their application involves toxicological risks. The aim of this study was to evaluate the mutagenic, cytotoxic, phytotoxic, and in vivo antifungal activity of chitosan-pyrrole-2-carboxylic acid nanobiocomposites (CS-PCA). The CS-PCA nanoparticles were synthesized by means of the nanoprecipitation technique with a size and ζ-potential of 502 ± 72 nm and + 54.7 ± 15.0 mV, respectively. According to the Ames test, no evidence of mutagenic activity was observed in Salmonella typhimurium strains. The cytotoxic assay showed that the incorporation of PCA into the CS matrix increased the toxic effect on ARPE-19 cells. However, fluorescence microscopy of ARPE-19 cells did not reveal morphostructural changes allusive to cell injury. CS-PCA exhibited strong phytotoxicity on lettuce seeds and the complete inhibition of seed development. The antifungal assay demonstrated that the CS-PCA delayed Aspergillus niger infection in tomato fruit until day 3; however, its use for the pre-treatment of seeds might exert adverse effects on plant development.

Indexed as

ChitosanNanoparticlesAntifungal AgentsEukaryotic CellsAntifungal AgentsChitosanAntifungal activityAntimicrobial biopolymersBiocompositesFood chainToxicity

Identifiers

PMID32902751
OpenAlexW3084030238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.