ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2020
A simulation-based approach to assess the power of trend detection in high- and low-frequency water quality records.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of sampling frequency impact on the accuracy of water quality status as determined considering different water quality monitoring objectives.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To provide more precise understanding of water quality changes, continuous sampling is being used more in surface water quality monitoring networks. However, it remains unclear how much improvement continuous monitoring provides over spot sampling, in identifying water quality changes over time. This study aims (1) to assess our ability to detect trends using water quality data of both high and low frequencies and (2) to assess the value of using high-frequency data as a surrogate to help detect trends in other constituents. Statistical regression models were used to identify temporal trends and then to assess the trend detection power of high-frequency (15 min) and low-frequency (monthly) data for turbidity and electrical conductivity (EC) data collected across Victoria, Australia. In addition, we developed surrogate models to simulate five sediment and nutrients constituents from runoff, turbidity and EC. A simulation-based statistical approach was then used to the compare the power to detect trends between the low- and high-frequency water quality records. Results show that high-frequency sampling shows clear benefits in trend detection power for turbidity, EC, as well as simulated sediment and nutrients, especially over short data periods. For detecting a 1% annual trend with 5 years of data, up to 97% and 94% improvements on the trend detection probability are offered by high-frequency data compared with monthly data, for turbidity and EC, respectively. Our results highlight the benefits of upgrading monitoring networks with wider application of high-frequency sampling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32902735What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.