Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32902669›Full record

ReviewDer Unfallchirurg2020

[Minimally invasive posterior and anterior stabilization of the thoracolumbar spine after traumatic injuries].

M Dreimann, M Stangenberg, S O Eicker, K-H Frosch, L Viezens

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Unfallchirurg, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Impact of D-Dimer on Postoperative Deep Vein Thrombosis in Patients with Thoracolumbar Fracture Caused by High-Energy Injuries.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
  3. Dynamic Changes and Relevant Factors of Perioperative Deep Vein Thrombosis in Patients with Thoracolumbar Fractures Caused by High-Energy Injuries.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M DreimannSektion Wirbelsäulenchirurgie, Klinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland. m.dreimann@uke.de.
M StangenbergSektion Wirbelsäulenchirurgie, Klinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland.
S O EickerSpinale Neurochirurgie, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland.
K-H FroschKlinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.
L ViezensSektion Wirbelsäulenchirurgie, Klinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Injuries of the thoracolumbar junction are the most common fractures of the spine due to their anatomical position and load. Common classification systems differentiate between stable and unstable injuries and thus also between operative and conservative therapy. The majority of injuries can be treated conservatively; however, unstable injuries require surgical treatment for a variety of reasons. In the grey area between stable and unstable injuries, a clinical decision based on clinical experience is necessary in order to select the best treatment. A wide variety of parameters must be included and a change in strategy from conservative to operative may also be necessary. Posterior instrumentation is the most common procedure; purely anterior stabilization is rarely used. The length of the instrumentation/spondylodesis depends on bone quality, age of the patient, and fracture. The decision as to whether anterior operative treatment should be performed depends on fracture morphology, success of reduction, and the resulting stability. The open surgical procedure is increasingly being replaced by minimally invasive procedures in posterior and anterior techniques but can be an advantage in complex injuries (B and C injuries according to AO). Hybrid procedures are also possible. This also applies to the treatment of osteoporotic fractures, since a clear assignment between traumatic and osteoporotic cause is not always easy and possible. This article describes the principles, the possible indications, and limitations of minimally invasive posterior and anterior stabilization.

Indexed as

Minimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPlastic Surgery ProceduresSpinal FracturesSpinal FusionHumansLumbar VertebraeThoracic VertebraeClassification fractureDecompressionMinimally invasive surgical proceduresOperative or conservative therapySpinal fusion

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.