Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32902387›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2020

Quality of Care Perceived by Older Patients and Caregivers in Integrated Care Pathways With Interviewing Assistance From a Social Robot: Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial.

Roel Boumans, Fokke van Meulen, William van Aalst, Joyce Albers, Marèse Janssen, Marieke Peters-Kop, Getty Huisman-de Waal, Alexandra van de Poll, Koen Hindriks, Mark Neerincx and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03857789 (Supporting Health Care Professionals With a Social Robot in an Integrated Care Pathway), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03857789 nacompletednot on this map

Supporting Health Care Professionals With a Social Robot in an Integrated Care Pathway: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorRadboud University Medical CenterRan2019 to 2020Enrolled80ConditionsFrailty at Older AdultsArmsQuestionnaire
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Enhancing Nurse-Robot Engagement: Two-Wave Survey Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Roel BoumansGeriatric Department, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1287-6363
Fokke van MeulenDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5486-9663
William van AalstGeriatric Department, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0561-125X
Joyce AlbersGeriatric Department, Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5438-4869
Marèse JanssenGeriatric Department, Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5499-4931
Marieke Peters-KopGeriatric Department, Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8781-9390
Getty Huisman-de WaalIQ healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2811-4176
Alexandra van de PollGeriatric Department, Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9724-6861
Koen HindriksSocial AI Group, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5707-5236
Mark NeerincxFaculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8161-5722
Marcel Olde RikkertGeriatric Department, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1397-1677
Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLDelft University of Technology · NLKempenhaeghe · NLVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSociety is facing a global shortage of 17 million health care workers, along with increasing health care demands from a growing number of older adults. Social robots are being considered as solutions to part of this problem.

objectiveOur objective is to evaluate the quality of care perceived by patients and caregivers for an integrated care pathway in an outpatient clinic using a social robot for patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) interviews versus the currently used professional interviews.

methodsA multicenter, two-parallel-group, nonblinded, randomized controlled trial was used to test for noninferiority of the quality of care delivered through robot-assisted care. The randomization was performed using a computer-generated table. The setting consisted of two outpatient clinics, and the study took place from July to December 2019. Of 419 patients who visited the participating outpatient clinics, 110 older patients met the criteria for recruitment. Inclusion criteria were the ability to speak and read Dutch and being assisted by a participating health care professional. Exclusion criteria were serious hearing or vision problems, serious cognitive problems, and paranoia or similar psychiatric problems. The intervention consisted of a social robot conducting a 36-item PROM. As the main outcome measure, the customized Consumer Quality Index (CQI) was used, as reported by patients and caregivers for the outpatient pathway of care.

resultsIn total, 75 intermediately frail older patients were included in the study, randomly assigned to the intervention and control groups, and processed: 36 female (48%) and 39 male (52%); mean age 77.4 years (SD 7.3), range 60-91 years. There was no significant difference in the total patient CQI scores between the patients included in the robot-assisted care pathway (mean 9.27, SD 0.65, n=37) and those in the control group (mean 9.00, SD 0.70, n=38): P=.08, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.58. There was no significant difference in the total CQI scores between caregivers in the intervention group (mean 9.21, SD 0.76, n=30) and those in the control group (mean 9.09, SD 0.60, n=35): P=.47, 95% CI -0.21 to 0.46. No harm or unintended effects occurred.

conclusionsGeriatric patients and their informal caregivers valued robot-assisted and nonrobot-assisted care pathways equally.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03857789; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03857789.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedFemaleHumansInterview, PsychologicalMaleMiddle AgedQuality of Health CareRoboticsintegrated care pathwaynoninferiority randomized controlled trialquality of caresocial robot

Identifiers

PMID32902387
PMCPMC7511864
OpenAlexW3044985114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.