Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32901864›Full record

ArticleMolecular medicine reports2020

Functional classification of prostate cancer‑associated miRNAs through CRISPR/Cas9‑mediated gene knockout.

Fu-Neng Jiang, Yu-Xiang Liang, Wang Wei, Cui-Yun Zou, Guan-Xing Chen, Yue-Ping Wan, Ze-Zhen Liu, Yang Yang, Zhao-Dong Han, Jian-Guo Zhu and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Fu-Neng JiangDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510180, P.R. China.
Yu-Xiang LiangDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510180, P.R. China.
Wang WeiDepartment of Urology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medicine University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550002, P.R. China.
Cui-Yun ZouGuangzhou Key Laboratory of Aquatic Animal Diseases and Waterfowl Breeding, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510225, P.R. China.
Guan-Xing ChenDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510180, P.R. China.
Yue-Ping WanDepartment of Urology, Huadu District People's Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510800, P.R. China.
Ze-Zhen LiuDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510180, P.R. China.
Yang YangDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510180, P.R. China.
Zhao-Dong HanDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510180, P.R. China.
Jian-Guo ZhuDepartment of Urology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medicine University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550002, P.R. China.
Wei-De ZhongDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510180, P.R. China.
South China University of Technology · CNGuangzhou Medical University · CNGuizhou Provincial People's Hospital · CNGuangzhou First People's Hospital · CNSouthern Medical University · CNZhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to use the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR‑associated (Cas) 9‑mediated gene knockout technology for the rapid classification of the differential function of micro (mi)RNAs screened using miRNA expression profiling by microarray. The rational design of single guide RNAs for the CRISPR/Cas9 system was verified to function in human LNCaP cells with rapid and efficient target gene editing. miRNA (miR)‑205, miR‑221, miR‑222, miR‑30c, miR‑224, miR‑455‑3p, miR‑23b and miR‑505 were downregulated in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) and were experimentally validated to function as tumor suppressors in prostate cancer cells, affecting tumor proliferation, invasion and aerobic glycolysis. In addition, the data of the present study suggested that miR‑663a and mfiR‑1225‑5p were upregulated in prostate cancer tissues and cell proliferation of miR‑663a and miR‑1225‑5p knockout PCa cells was significantly lower compared with miR‑NC cells. Furthermore, knockout of miR‑1225‑5p and miR‑663a significantly decreased the lactate production in LNCaP cells in vitro. In conclusion, the present study offered a simple and efficient method for rapidly classifying miRNA function by applying CRISPR/Cas9 in LNCaP cells. The present study suggested, for the first time to the best of the authors' knowledge, that the aberrant expression of miR‑663a and miR‑1225‑5p may be involved with the progression of prostate cancer, implying their potential as candidate markers for this type of cancer. However, the precise role of miR‑663a and miR‑1225‑5p in accelerating the development of prostate cancer and promoting tumor progression remains to be elucidated.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorCell MovementCell ProliferationCRISPR-Cas SystemsDisease ProgressionGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Knockout TechniquesGlycolysisHumansMaleMicroRNAsProstatic NeoplasmsMicroRNAsMIRN1225 microRNA, humanMIRN663 microRNA, human

Identifiers

PMID32901864
PMCPMC7533463
OpenAlexW3083627738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.