Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32901457›Full record

ReviewKorean journal of radiology2021

Radiologic Evaluation and Structured Reporting Form for Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer: 2019 Consensus Recommendations from the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology.

Dong Ho Lee, Bohyun Kim, Eun Sun Lee, Hyoung Jung Kim, Ji Hye Min, Jeong Min Lee, Moon Hyung Choi, Nieun Seo, Sang Hyun Choi, Seong Hyun Kim and 4 more

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Korean journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Practice guidelines for managing extrahepatic biliary tract cancers.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Introducing "Recommendation and Guideline" of theKorean journal of radiology · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Dong Ho LeeDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8983-851X
Bohyun KimDepartment of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1157-415X
Eun Sun LeeDepartment of Radiology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0780-7985
Hyoung Jung KimDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3391-5621
Ji Hye MinDepartment of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8496-6771
Jeong Min LeeDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0561-8777
Moon Hyung ChoiDepartment of Radiology, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5962-4772
Nieun SeoDepartment of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8745-6454
Sang Hyun ChoiDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6898-6617
Seong Hyun KimDepartment of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0676-2191
Seung Soo LeeDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5518-2249
Yang Shin ParkDepartment of Radiology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1918-2276
Yong Eun ChungDepartment of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. yelv@yuhs.ac.ORCID 0000-0003-0811-9578
Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiologic imaging is important for evaluating extrahepatic bile duct (EHD) cancers; it is used for staging tumors and evaluating the suitability of surgical resection, as surgery may be contraindicated in some cases regardless of tumor stage. However, the published general recommendations for EHD cancer and recommendations guided by the perspectives of radiologists are limited. The Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology (KSAR) study group for EHD cancer developed key questions and corresponding recommendations for the radiologic evaluation of EHD cancer and organized them into 4 sections: nomenclature and definition, imaging technique, cancer evaluation, and tumor response. A structured reporting form was also developed to allow the progressive accumulation of standardized data, which will facilitate multicenter studies and contribute more evidence for the development of recommendations.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsBile Ducts, ExtrahepaticBlood VesselsCholangiopancreatography, Magnetic ResonanceHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm StagingSocieties, MedicalTomography, X-Ray ComputedCommon bile duct neoplasmsConsensusExtrahepatic bile duct cancerKlatskin tumorStructured reporting form

Identifiers

PMID32901457
PMCPMC7772383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.