Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32901438›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2021

Barriers and Facilitators of Using Quality Improvement To Foster Locally Initiated Innovation in Palliative Care Services in India.

Karleen F Giannitrapani, Aanchal Satija, Archana Ganesh, Raziel Gamboa, Soraya Fereydooni, Taylor Hennings, Shivani Chandrashekaran, Jake Mickelsen, Michelle DeNatale, Odette Spruijt and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Operationalising palliative care integration: Experiences of implementers in South Africa.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. JCO global oncology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Karleen F GiannitrapaniCenter for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Menlo Park, CA, USA. Karleen@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0987-6204
Aanchal SatijaAll India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Archana GaneshAll India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Raziel GamboaCenter for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Soraya FereydooniCenter for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Taylor HenningsUniversity of California Berkeley School of Public Health, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Shivani ChandrashekaranDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Jake MickelsenStanford Healthcare, Stanford, CA, USA.
Michelle DeNataleStanford Healthcare, Stanford, CA, USA.
Odette SpruijtPeter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Sushma BhatnagarAll India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Karl A LorenzCenter for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
VA Palo Alto Health Care System · USAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INStanford Health Care · USBerkeley Public Health Division · USDuke University · USPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuality improvement (QI) methods represent a vehicle for fostering locally initiated innovation cycles. We partnered with palliative care services from seven diverse practice settings in India to foster locally initiated improvement projects.

objectiveTo evaluate the implementation experiences of locally initiated palliative care improvement projects at seven diverse sites and understand the barriers and facilitators of using QI to improve palliative care in India.

participantsWe use a quota sampling approach to capture the perspectives of 44 local stakeholders in each of the following three categories (organizational leaders, clinic leaders, and clinical team members) through a semi-structured interview guide informed by the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR). We use standard qualitative methods to identify facilitators and barriers to using QI methods in seven diverse palliative care contexts.

resultsAcross all sites, respondents emphasized the following factors important in the success of quality improvement initiative: leveraging clinic level data, QI methods training, provider buy-in, engaged mentors, committed leadership, team support, interdepartmental coordination, collaborations with other providers, local champions, and having a structure for accountability. Barriers to using QI methods to improve palliative care services included lack of designated staff, high patient volume, resources, patient population geographic constraints, general awareness and acceptance of palliative care, and culture.

conclusionsEmpowering local leaders and medical personnel to champion, design, and iterate using QI methods represents a promising powerful tool to spread palliative care services in developing countries.

Indexed as

Palliative CareQuality ImprovementHealth PersonnelHumansIndiaLeadershipQualitative Researchimplementation evaluationIndiapalliative carequalitativequality improvement

Identifiers

PMID32901438
PMCPMC7878595
OpenAlexW3084305316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.