ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021
Factors inducing bryophyte growth on prehistoric pigments and effect of UV-C treatment.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In La Glacière cave (France), the touristic activity has been conducted to an environmental parameter change that has led to photosynthetic organism proliferation (microalgae, diatoms, cyanobacteria, bryophytes). The present study is focused on bryophyte development occurring in the show cave that was responsible of limestone biodeterioration. In order to understand the colonization process of limestone, we have maintained limestone blocks under optimal Lampenflora growth conditions. Moreover, some limestone blocks were painted with several pigments that were used in the prehistory (e.g., red ocher, bone char). Microorganisms and bryophyte growth were monitored during 1 year, and then, the block samples were treated using UV-C light (254 nm). Thus, obtained results were compared with in situ treatment in La Glacière cave. Results have showed dense bryophyte propagation on the several blocks. However, the growth rate was correlated with the chemical composition of the pigment. In fact, the presence of some chemical elements such as As, Cr, Ti, and Co contributed to reduce bryophyte growth. Finally, moss treatment using UV-C light has demonstrated high efficiency under in situ condition, while a fast recolonization has been observed for samples maintained in laboratory. This difference was explained by the high bryophyte density under laboratory conditions that make UV-C light penetration difficult.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.