Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32901366›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2021

Correlations between long-term quality of life and patient needs and concerns following head and neck cancer treatment and the impact of psychological distress. A multicentric cross-sectional study.

Roxane Elaldi, Lise-Marie Roussel, Jocelyn Gal, Boris Scheller, Emmanuel Chamorey, Renaud Schiappa, Audrey Lasne-Cardon, Marie-Yolande Louis, Dorian Culié, Olivier Dassonville and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cancer care coordination determinants of depression in head and neck cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Patient-reported outcomes in head and neck cancer: a cross-sectional analysis of quality of life domains across early and advanced UICC stages.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. The Patient Concerns Inventory in head and neck oncology: a structured review of its development, validation and clinical implications.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Roxane Elaldi, 31 avenue de Valombrose, 06103, Nice, France.
Lise-Marie RousselDepartment of Maxillo-Facial and Head and Neck Surgery, François Baclese Centre, Caen, France.
Jocelyn GalDepartment of Statistics, Antoine Lacassagne Centre, Côte D'Azur University, Nice, France.
Boris Scheller, 31 avenue de Valombrose, 06103, Nice, France.
Emmanuel ChamoreyDepartment of Statistics, Antoine Lacassagne Centre, Côte D'Azur University, Nice, France.
Renaud SchiappaDepartment of Statistics, Antoine Lacassagne Centre, Côte D'Azur University, Nice, France.
Audrey Lasne-CardonDepartment of Maxillo-Facial and Head and Neck Surgery, François Baclese Centre, Caen, France.
Marie-Yolande LouisDepartment of Maxillo-Facial and Head and Neck Surgery, François Baclese Centre, Caen, France.
Dorian Culié, 31 avenue de Valombrose, 06103, Nice, France.
Olivier Dassonville, 31 avenue de Valombrose, 06103, Nice, France.
Gilles Poissonnet, 31 avenue de Valombrose, 06103, Nice, France.
Esma SaadaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Centre, Côte D'Azur University, Nice, France.
Karen BenezeryDepartment of Radiotherapy, Antoine Lacassagne Centre, Côte D'Azur University, Nice, France.
Emmanuel BabinDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Centre of Caen, Caen, France.
Alexandre Bozec, 31 avenue de Valombrose, 06103, Nice, France. alexandre.bozec@nice.unicancer.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8576-3052

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess patient needs and concerns after head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treatment and their possible correlations with long-term quality of life (QoL) and to examine the potential impact of psychological distress on these results.

methodsAlive and disease-free HNSCC patients at least 1 year after treatment were enrolled in this cross-sectional multicentric study and completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and H&N35 QoL questionnaires, the head and neck cancer-specific patient concerns inventory (PCI-HN) questionnaire and the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS). Correlations between QoL outcomes and patient needs and concerns were investigated using Spearman's correlation tests.

resultsSeventy-two patients were enrolled in the study. Fear of cancer recurrence was the main patient concern followed by dental, salivary, fatigue, speech, and eating problems. The leading patient needs in terms of consultation were to be referred to the surgeon, the speech, and swallow therapist and the oral rehabilitation team. The number of patient concerns correlated negatively (r < .40) with functioning scales score and positively (r > .40) with general and head and neck symptoms. Psychological distress was the main determinant of QoL outcomes (p < .0001). We found a significant impact of gender (p = .002) on the number of patient concerns, and of patient age (p = .003) on the number of staff members selected by patients.

conclusionIdentification of patient needs and concerns along with multidisciplinary management of persistent symptoms and psychological distress seem essential steps towards improving QoL of HNSCC patients.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPsychological DistressCross-Sectional StudiesHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesHead and neck cancerPatient concernsPatient needsPsychological distressQuality of life

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.