Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32901349›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of colorectal disease2021

The risk of lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer: new parameters to assess the degree of submucosal invasion.

Nicola Cracco, Valentina Todaro, Giuseppe Pedrazzi, Paolo Del Rio, Najib Haboubi, Roberto Zinicola

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of colorectal disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicola CraccoGeneral Surgery Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, 37024, Negrar, Verona, Italy. nicracco2@gmail.com.
Valentina TodaroGeneral Surgery Unit, M. Mellini Hospital, 25032, Chiari, Brescia, Italy.
Giuseppe PedrazziDepartment of Medicine and Surgery-Unit of Neuroscience, Interdepartmental Centre of Robust Statistic (Ro.S.A.), Parma University, 43126, Parma, Italy.
Paolo Del RioGeneral Surgery Unit, University Hospital Parma, 43126, Parma, Italy.
Najib HaboubiDepartment of Pathology, Spire Healthcare Trust, Manchester, M14 7LU, UK.
Roberto ZinicolaGeneral Surgery Unit, University Hospital Parma, 43126, Parma, Italy.
University of Parma · ITOspedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria · ITSpire Manchester Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn T1 colorectal cancer, the depth is the main factor assessing the degree of submucosal invasion (DSI) to predict the risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM). The width (WSI) and the area of submucosal invasion (ASI) have been suggested as additional parameters to assess the risk of LNM. A review of the literature was undertaken on the correlation between WSI and ASI parameters and the incidence of LNM.

methodsA Medline, PubMed, and Cochrane Library search was performed to retrieve all studies reporting correlation between WSI/ASI and risk of LNM in T1 colorectal cancer.

resultsEight studies including 1727 patients were identified. All considered the degree of WSI and its influence on LNM: seven assessed different width cut-off of submucosal invasion, and one study the mean width of submucosal invasion in patients having or not involved lymph nodes. The WSI was significantly a prognostic factor for LNM (p < 0.05) in four studies. Both 2 and 3 mm seem to be the most discriminatory cut-off values of submucosal width invasion in defining the risk difference of LNM above and below the cut-off (2 mm, OR = infinite; 3 mm, OR = 6.9). Patients having a cut-off ≤ 5 mm of WSI showed a low risk (5.6%) of LNM rendering radical surgery unnecessary. Four studies assessed the risk of LNM according to the involved submucosal area (width × depth). In two of these, the ASI was a significant prognostic factor for LNM (p < 0.05).

conclusionThe WSI and ASI seem to be reliable prognostic factors for LNM in T1 colorectal cancer. There is no agreement on ideal cut-off value.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesNeoplasm InvasivenessRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAreaEarly rectal cancerLymph node metastasisSubmucosal invasionT1 colorectal cancerWidth

Identifiers

PMID32901349
OpenAlexW3085376651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.