Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32901323›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of surgery2020

Prospectively Randomized Controlled Trial on Damage Control Surgery for Perforated Diverticulitis with Generalized Peritonitis.

Reinhold Kafka-Ritsch, Matthias Zitt, Alexander Perathoner, Elisabeth Gasser, Claudia Kaufman, Sasha Czipin, Felix Aigner, Dietmar Öfner

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04034407 (Prospectively Randomized Controlled Trial on Damage Control Surgery for Perforated Diverticulitis With Generalized Peritonitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04034407 nacompletednot on this map

Prospectively Randomized Controlled Trial on Damage Control Surgery for Perforated Diverticulitis With Generalized Peritonitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical University InnsbruckRan2013 to 2018Enrolled22ConditionsDamage Control for Perforated DiverticulitisArmsDamage control surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Increased use of damage control laparotomy for emergency small bowel or colon surgery: does it affect patient outcomes?European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Reinhold Kafka-RitschDepartment of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Centre for Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria. reinhold.kafka-ritsch@tirol-kliniken.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1626-3430
Matthias ZittDepartment of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Centre for Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Alexander PerathonerDepartment of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Centre for Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Elisabeth GasserDepartment of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Centre for Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Claudia KaufmanDepartment of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Centre for Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Sasha CzipinDepartment of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Centre for Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Felix AignerDepartment of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Centre for Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Dietmar ÖfnerDepartment of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Centre for Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Innsbruck Medical University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDamage control surgery (DCS) with abdominal negative pressure therapy and delayed anastomosis creation in patients with perforated diverticulitis and generalized peritonitis was established at our Institution in 2006 and has been published. The concept was adopted in other hospitals and published as a case series. This is the first prospectively controlled randomized study comparing DCS and conventional treatment (Group C) in this setting.

methodsAll consecutive patients from 2013 to 2018 with indication for surgery were screened and randomized to Group DCS or Group C. The primary outcome was the rate of reconstructed bowel at discharge and at 6 month. Informed consent was obtained. The trial was approved by the local ethics committee and registered at CinicalTrials.gov: NCT04034407.

resultsA total of 56 patients were screened; 41 patients gave informed consent to participate and ultimately 21 patients (9 female) with intraoperatively confirmed Hinchey III (n = 14, 67%) or IV (n = 7, 33%), and a median (range) age of 66 (42-92), Mannheim Peritonitis Index of 25 (12-37) and Charlson Comorbidity Index of 3 (0-10) were intraoperatively randomized and treated as Group DCS (n = 13) or Group C (n = 8). Per protocol analysis: A primary anastomosis without ileostomy (PA) was performed in 92% (11/12) patients in Group DCS at the second-look operation, one patient died before second look, and one underwent a Hartmann procedure (HP). In Group C 63% (5/8) patients received a PA and 38% (3/8) patients a HP. Two patients in Group C, but none in Group DCS experienced anastomotic leakage (AI). ICU and hospital stay was median (range) 2 (1-10) and 17.5 (12-43) in DCS and 2 (1-62) and 22 (13-65) days in group C. In Group DCS 8% (1/12) patients was discharged with a stoma versus 57% (4/7) in Group C (p = 0.038, n.s., α = 0.025); one patient died before discharge. The odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for discharge with a stoma is 0.068 (0.005-0.861). Intent to treat analysis: A PA was performed in 90% (9/10) of patients randomized to DCS, one patient died before the second look, and one patient received a HP. In group C, 70% (7/10) were treated with PA and 30% (3/10) with HP. 29% (2/7) experienced AI treated with protective ileostomy. In group DCS, 9% (1/11) were discharged with a stoma versus 40% (4/10) in group C (p = 0.14, n.s.). The odds ratio for discharge with a stoma is 0.139 (0.012-1.608).

conclusionThis is the first prospectively randomized controlled study showing that damage control surgery in perforated diverticulitis Hinchey III and IV enhances reconstruction of bowel continuity and can reduce the stoma rate at discharge.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnastomosis, SurgicalDiverticulitisFemaleHumansIntestinal PerforationMaleMiddle AgedNegative-Pressure Wound TherapyPeritonitisProspective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID32901323
PMCPMC7599157
OpenAlexW3083813224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.