Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32901072›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Standardized massage interventions as protocols for the induction of psychophysiological relaxation in the laboratory: a block randomized, controlled trial.

Maria Meier, Eva Unternaehrer, Stephanie J Dimitroff, Annika B E Benz, Ulrike U Bentele, Sabine M Schorpp, Maya Wenzel, Jens C Pruessner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maria MeierDepartment of Psychology, Division of Clinical Neuropsychology, University of Constance, Constance, Germany. maria.meier@uni.kn.
Eva UnternaehrerDepartment of Psychology, Division of Clinical Neuropsychology, University of Constance, Constance, Germany.
Stephanie J DimitroffDepartment of Psychology, Division of Clinical Neuropsychology, University of Constance, Constance, Germany.
Annika B E BenzDepartment of Psychology, Division of Clinical Neuropsychology, University of Constance, Constance, Germany.
Ulrike U BenteleDepartment of Psychology, Division of Clinical Neuropsychology, University of Constance, Constance, Germany.
Sabine M SchorppDepartment of Psychology, Division of Clinical Neuropsychology, University of Constance, Constance, Germany.
Maya WenzelDepartment of Psychology, Division of Clinical Neuropsychology, University of Constance, Constance, Germany.
Jens C PruessnerDepartment of Psychology, Division of Clinical Neuropsychology, University of Constance, Constance, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health and disease are strongly linked to psychophysiological states. While stress research strongly benefits from standardized stressors, no established protocol focuses on the induction of psychophysiological relaxation. To maintain health, functioning regenerative systems are however likely as important as functioning stress systems. Thus, the identification of validated relaxation paradigms is needed. Here, we investigated whether standardized massages are capable of reliably inducing physiological and psychological states of relaxation. Relaxation was indicated by changes in high frequency heart rate variability (HF-HRV), a vagally-mediated heart rate variability component, and repeated ratings of subjective relaxation, and stress levels. Sixty healthy women were randomly assigned to a vagus nerve massage (n = 19), a soft shoulder massage (n = 22), or a resting control group (n = 19). During the intervention, HF-HRV and subjective relaxation increased, while subjective stress decreased significantly in all groups. Both massage interventions elicited significantly higher HF-HRV compared to the control group. Accordingly, both massage protocols increased psychophysiological relaxation, and may serve as useful tools in future research. However, future work will have to determine which of several protocols might be used as a gold standard to induce a psychophysiological state of relaxation in the laboratory.

Indexed as

PsychophysiologyAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleHeart RateHumansLaboratoriesMassageRelaxation TherapyStress, PsychologicalYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32901072
PMCPMC7479151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.