Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32901038›Full record

ArticleScientific data2020

K-EmoCon, a multimodal sensor dataset for continuous emotion recognition in naturalistic conversations.

Cheul Young Park, Narae Cha, Soowon Kang, Auk Kim, Ahsan Habib Khandoker, Leontios Hadjileontiadis, Alice Oh, Yong Jeong, Uichin Lee

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A Review on Deep Learning for Quality of Life Assessment Through the Use of Wearable Data.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Cheul Young ParkKorea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Graduate School of Knowledge Service Engineering, Daejeon, 34141, South Korea. cheulyop@kaist.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0414-272X
Narae ChaKorea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Graduate School of Knowledge Service Engineering, Daejeon, 34141, South Korea.
Soowon KangKorea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Graduate School of Knowledge Service Engineering, Daejeon, 34141, South Korea.
Auk KimKorea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Graduate School of Knowledge Service Engineering, Daejeon, 34141, South Korea.
Ahsan Habib KhandokerKhalifa University of Science and Technology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Abu Dhabi, 127788, United Arab Emirates.
Leontios HadjileontiadisKhalifa University of Science and Technology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Abu Dhabi, 127788, United Arab Emirates.
Alice OhKorea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, School of Computing, Daejeon, 34141, South Korea.
Yong JeongKorea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Department of Bio and Brain Engineering, Daejeon, 34141, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5907-3787
Uichin LeeKorea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Graduate School of Knowledge Service Engineering, Daejeon, 34141, South Korea. uclee@kaist.edu.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) NRF-2017M3C4A7065960
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recognizing emotions during social interactions has many potential applications with the popularization of low-cost mobile sensors, but a challenge remains with the lack of naturalistic affective interaction data. Most existing emotion datasets do not support studying idiosyncratic emotions arising in the wild as they were collected in constrained environments. Therefore, studying emotions in the context of social interactions requires a novel dataset, and K-EmoCon is such a multimodal dataset with comprehensive annotations of continuous emotions during naturalistic conversations. The dataset contains multimodal measurements, including audiovisual recordings, EEG, and peripheral physiological signals, acquired with off-the-shelf devices from 16 sessions of approximately 10-minute long paired debates on a social issue. Distinct from previous datasets, it includes emotion annotations from all three available perspectives: self, debate partner, and external observers. Raters annotated emotional displays at intervals of every 5 seconds while viewing the debate footage, in terms of arousal-valence and 18 additional categorical emotions. The resulting K-EmoCon is the first publicly available emotion dataset accommodating the multiperspective assessment of emotions during social interactions.

Indexed as

EmotionsSocial BehaviorSpeechArousalHumans

Identifiers

PMID32901038
PMCPMC7479607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.