Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32900906›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurointerventional surgery2021

Influence of simultaneous pressor and vasodilatory agents on the evolution of infarct growth in experimental acute middle cerebral artery occlusion.

Niloufar Saadat, Gregory A Christoforidis, Yong Ik Jeong, Mira Liu, Alexey Dimov, Steven Roth, Marek Niekrasz, Sameer A Ansari, Timothy Carroll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurointerventional surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Quantitative perfusion and water transport time model from multiJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Niloufar SaadatRadiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8152-599X
Gregory A ChristoforidisRadiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA gchristofo@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3800-0340
Yong Ik JeongRadiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6418-0309
Mira LiuRadiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8729-9302
Alexey DimovRadiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Steven RothAnesthesiology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Marek NiekraszAnimal Research Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Sameer A AnsariRadiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Timothy CarrollRadiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
University of Chicago · USNorthwestern University · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Development of Novel MR Imaging for Ischemic Stroke EvaluationR01NS093908 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI CARROLL, TIMOTHY J, CHRISTOFORIDIS, GREGORY · 2015 to 2019
$2.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS093908
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study sought to test the hypothesis that simultaneous central blood pressure elevation and potent vasodilation can mitigate pial collateral-dependent infarct growth in acute ischemic stroke.

methodsTwenty mongrel canines (20-30 kg) underwent permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). Eight subjects received continuous infusion of norepinephrine (0.1-1.5200 µg/kg/min; titrated to a median of 34 mmHg above baseline mean arterial pressure) and hydralazine (20 mg) starting 30 min following MCAO. Pial collateral recruitment was scored prior to treatment and used to predict infarct volume based on a previously reported parameterization. Serial diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisitions tracked infarct volumes over a 4-hour time frame. Infarct volumes and infarct volume growth between treatment and control groups were compared with each other and to predicted values. Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI, susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI), and necropsy findings were included in the evaluation.

resultsDifferences between treatment and control group varied by pial collateral recruitment based on indicator-variable regression effects analysis with interaction confirmed by regression model fit. Benefit in treatment group was only in subjects with poor collaterals which had 35.7% less infarct volume growth (P=0.0008; ANOVA) relative to controls. Measured infarct growth was significantly lower than predicted by the model (linear regression partial F-test, slope P<0.001, intercept=0.003). There was no evidence for cerebral hemorrhage or posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome.

conclusionOur results indicate that a combination of norepinephrine and hydralazine administered in the acute phase of ischemic stroke mitigates infarct evolution in subjects with poor but not good collateral recruitment.

Indexed as

Infarction, Middle Cerebral ArteryIschemic StrokeAnimalsCollateral CirculationDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingDogsDrug Therapy, CombinationHydralazineMagnetic Resonance AngiographyNorepinephrineTreatment OutcomeVasoconstrictor AgentsVasodilator AgentsHydralazineNorepinephrineVasoconstrictor AgentsVasodilator AgentsangiographybrainMRIstroke

Identifiers

PMID32900906
PMCPMC12281653
OpenAlexW3083982615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.