Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32900787›Full record

ArticleDiabetes care2020

The Association of Dietary Choline and Betaine With the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study.

Daniel T Dibaba, Karen C Johnson, Anna M Kucharska-Newton, Katie Meyer, Steven H Zeisel, Aurelian Bidulescu

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Combined effects of blood pressure and glucose status on the risk of chronic kidney disease.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Comparative study ofScientific reports · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel T DibabaTennessee Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN.ORCID 0000-0002-5734-8804
Karen C JohnsonTennessee Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN.
Anna M Kucharska-NewtonDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.
Katie MeyerDepartment of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Steven H ZeiselNutrition Research Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Kannapolis, NC.
Aurelian BidulescuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN abidules@indiana.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8211-8309
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · USIndiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa A. Troester · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CLINICAL NUTRITION RESEARCH UNITP30DK056350 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SUSAN M. SMITH · 1999 to 2026
$31.6M
Cardiovascular Epidemiology Training GrantT32HL007055 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Wayne D. Rosamond · 1986 to 2026
$10.0M
HUMAN REQUIREMENTS FOR THE NUTRIENT CHOLINER01DK055865 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ZEISEL, STEVEN H · 2000 to 2011
$7.6M
Diabetes and Prediabetes in Older Adults in ARICR01DK089174 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SELVIN, ELIZABETH · 2011 to 2020
$6.4M
NUTRITION TRAINING PROGRAMT32DK007686 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BECK, MELINDA A., MAYER-DAVIS, ELIZABETH J · 1992 to 2022
$4.3M
COMMUNITY AND COHORT SURVEILLANCE PROGRAMS-N01HC55015N01HC055015 · HC · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CHAMBLESS, LLOYD E · 1985 to 2006
$1.1M
A Novel Gut Microbial-Dependent Nutrient Metabolite and AtherosclerosisK01HL127159 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MEYER, KATIE A · 2015 to 2019
$787k
COMMUNITY AND COHORT SURVEILLANCE PROGRAMN01HC055016 · HC · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI BALLANTYNE, CHRISTIE M · 1985 to 2000
$785k
FIELD CENTER FOR CCSPN01HC055019 · HC · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI FOLSOM, AARON R · 1985 to 2000
$748k
FIELD CENTERN01HC055021 · HC · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER · PI JONES, DANIEL W · 1985 to 2000
$617k
CCSP-FIELD CENTERN01HC055020 · HC · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI NIETO, F JAVIER · 1985 to 2000
$334k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL127159NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HC055015NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HC055016NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HC055018NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HC055019NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HC055020NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HC055021NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HC055022NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007055NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056350NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK055865NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK089174NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007686NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the association between dietary intake of choline and betaine and the risk of type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsAmong 13,440 Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study participants, the prospective longitudinal association between dietary choline and betaine intake and the risk of type 2 diabetes was assessed using interval-censored Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models adjusted for baseline potential confounding variables.

resultsAmong 13,440 participants (55% women, mean age 54 [SD 7.4] years), 1,396 developed incident type 2 diabetes during median follow-up of 9 years from 1987 to 1998. There was no statistically significant association between every 1-SD increase in dietary choline and risk of type 2 diabetes (hazard ratio [HR] 1.01 [95% CI 0.87, 1.16]) nor between dietary betaine intake and the risk of type 2 diabetes (HR 1.01 [0.94, 1.10]). Those in the highest quartile of dietary choline intake did not have a statistically significant higher risk of type 2 diabetes than those in the lowest choline quartile (HR 1.09 [0.84, 1.42]); similarly, dietary betaine intake was not associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes comparing the highest quartile to the lowest (HR 1.06 [0.87, 1.29]). Among women, there was a higher risk of type 2 diabetes, comparing the highest to lowest dietary choline quartile (HR 1.54 [1.06, 2.25]), while in men, the association was null (HR 0.82 [0.57, 1.17]). Nevertheless, there was a nonsignificant interaction between high choline intake and sex on the risk of type 2 diabetes (

conclusionsOverall and among male participants, dietary choline or betaine intakes were not associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes. Among female participants, there was a trend for a modestly higher risk of type 2 diabetes among those with the highest as compared with the lowest quartile of dietary choline intake. Our study should inform clinical trials on dietary choline and betaine supplementation in relationship with the risk of type 2 diabetes.

Indexed as

BetaineCholineDietEatingDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLogistic ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSelf ReportBetaineCholine

Identifiers

PMID32900787
PMCPMC7576425
OpenAlexW3084226973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.