ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2020
Invasive and Non-Invasive Ventilation in Patients With COVID-19.
Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sequential non-invasive following short-term invasive mechanical ventilation in the treatment of tuberculosis with respiratory failure: a randomized controlled study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2021Trial
- Anesthesiology competencies in undergraduate medical education: a comparative study of curriculum frameworks in Brazil, Spain, and the United Kingdom.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- The use of non-invasive ventilation by emergency doctors in Johannesburg Academic Hospitals, South Africa - assessing knowledge, attitudes and practices.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2023Article
- The COVID-19 Driving Force: How It Shaped the Evidence of Non-Invasive Respiratory Support.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Performance and labor conditions of physiotherapists in Brazilian intensive care units during the COVID-19 pandemic. What did we learn?Critical care science · 2023Article
- Analysis of an Individualised Stepwise Approach to Non-Pharmacological Therapy in COVID-19.Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases · 2023Article
- Impact of establishing a respiratory high dependency unit for SCAP patients on the therapeutic effect, prognosis, and expenditure: a retrospective case-control study.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Clinical characteristics and determinants of mortality in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients on an intensive care unit-a retrospective explorative 1-year all-comers study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2022Article
- Management of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infections with focus on patients with chronic lung diseases (as of 10 January 2022) : Updated statement of the Austrian Society of Pneumology (ASP).Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2022Article
- [COVID-19 pandemic: preferences and barriers for dissemination of evidence syntheses : Survey of intensive care personnel in Germany].Der Anaesthesist · 2022Article
- [Development of a giant bulla under spontaneous breathing by self-inflicted lung injury in a patient with COVID-19 pneumonia].Der Anaesthesist · 2022Article
- Trauma patients with SARS-CoV-2 in German ICUs during the 2nd wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022Article
- Article
- Noninvasive Ventilation and Oxygenation Strategies.The Surgical clinics of North America · 2022Review
- Observational study of changes in utilization and outcomes in mechanical ventilation in COVID-19.PloS one · 2022Observational
- Risk Assessment for Patients with Chronic Respiratory Conditions in the Context of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic Statement of the German Respiratory Society with the Support of the German Association of Chest Physicians.Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases · 2022Review
- The optimal management of the patient with COVID-19 pneumonia: HFNC, NIV/CPAP or mechanical ventilation?African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine · 2022Review
- [Development and progress in mechanical ventilation].Der Pneumologe · 2022Review
- The demographic, clinical, and medical manifestations of pulmonary thromboembolism development in COVID-19.Blood research · 2021Article
- Management of COVID-19-Associated Acute Respiratory Failure with Alternatives to Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: High-Flow Oxygen, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, and Noninvasive Ventilation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe reported high mortality of COVID-19 patients in intensive care has given rise to a debate over whether patients with this disease are being intubated too soon and might instead benefit from more non-invasive ventilation.
methodsThis review is based on articles published up to 12 June 2020 that were retrieved by a selective literature search on the topic of invasive and non-invasive ventilation for respiratory failure in COVID-19. Guideline recommendations and study data on patients with respiratory failure in settings other than COVID-19 are also considered, as are the current figures of the intensive care registry of the German Interdisciplinary Association for Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin).
resultsThe high mortality figures among patients receiving invasive ventilation that have been reported in studies from abroad cannot be uncritically applied to the current situation in Germany. Study data on ventilation specifically in COVID-19 patients would be needed to do justice to the special pathophysiology of this disease, but such data are lacking. Being intubated too early is evidently associated with risks for the patient, but being intubated too late is as well. A particularly im - portant consideration is the potential harm associated with prolonged spontaneous breathing, with or without non-invasive assistance, as any increase in respiratory work can seriously worsen respiratory failure. On the other hand, it is clearly unacceptable to intubate patients too early merely out of concern that the medical staff might become infected with COVID-19 if they were ventilated non-invasively.
conclusionNasal high flow, non-invasive ventilation, and invasive ventilation with intubation should be carried out in a stepwise treatment strategy, under appropriate intensive-care monitoring and with the observance of all relevant anti-infectious precautions. Germany is better prepared that other countries to provide COVID-19 patients with appropriate respiratory care, in view of the high per capita density of intensive-care beds and the availability of a nationwide, interdisciplinary intensive care registry for the guidance and coordination of intensive care in patients who need it.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.