Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32900426›Full record

ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2020

Invasive and Non-Invasive Ventilation in Patients With COVID-19.

Wolfram Windisch, Steffen Weber-Carstens, Stefan Kluge, Rolf Rossaint, Tobias Welte, Christian Karagiannidis

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Analysis of an Individualised Stepwise Approach to Non-Pharmacological Therapy in COVID-19.Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Trauma patients with SARS-CoV-2 in German ICUs during the 2nd wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Noninvasive Ventilation and Oxygenation Strategies.The Surgical clinics of North America · 2022
    Review
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Wolfram WindischDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Kliniken der Stadt Köln gGmbH, University of Witten/Herdecke; Surgical Intensive Care, Department of Anesthesiology, Charité University Medical Center, Berlin; Department of Intensive Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Aachen, RWTH Aachen University; Director of Patient Care at MHH, The German Center for Lung Research, University Medical School Hanover (MHH), Hanover.
Steffen Weber-Carstens
Stefan Kluge
Rolf Rossaint
Tobias Welte
Christian Karagiannidis
Universität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe reported high mortality of COVID-19 patients in intensive care has given rise to a debate over whether patients with this disease are being intubated too soon and might instead benefit from more non-invasive ventilation.

methodsThis review is based on articles published up to 12 June 2020 that were retrieved by a selective literature search on the topic of invasive and non-invasive ventilation for respiratory failure in COVID-19. Guideline recommendations and study data on patients with respiratory failure in settings other than COVID-19 are also considered, as are the current figures of the intensive care registry of the German Interdisciplinary Association for Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin).

resultsThe high mortality figures among patients receiving invasive ventilation that have been reported in studies from abroad cannot be uncritically applied to the current situation in Germany. Study data on ventilation specifically in COVID-19 patients would be needed to do justice to the special pathophysiology of this disease, but such data are lacking. Being intubated too early is evidently associated with risks for the patient, but being intubated too late is as well. A particularly im - portant consideration is the potential harm associated with prolonged spontaneous breathing, with or without non-invasive assistance, as any increase in respiratory work can seriously worsen respiratory failure. On the other hand, it is clearly unacceptable to intubate patients too early merely out of concern that the medical staff might become infected with COVID-19 if they were ventilated non-invasively.

conclusionNasal high flow, non-invasive ventilation, and invasive ventilation with intubation should be carried out in a stepwise treatment strategy, under appropriate intensive-care monitoring and with the observance of all relevant anti-infectious precautions. Germany is better prepared that other countries to provide COVID-19 patients with appropriate respiratory care, in view of the high per capita density of intensive-care beds and the availability of a nationwide, interdisciplinary intensive care registry for the guidance and coordination of intensive care in patients who need it.

Indexed as

Coronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19GermanyHumansNoninvasive VentilationPandemicsPneumonia, ViralRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Insufficiency

Identifiers

PMID32900426
PMCPMC7658682
OpenAlexW3042019532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.