Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32900375›Full record

ArticleMolecular neurodegeneration2020

Two C-terminal sequence variations determine differential neurotoxicity between human and mouse α-synuclein.

Natalie Landeck, Katherine E Strathearn, Daniel Ysselstein, Kerstin Buck, Sayan Dutta, Siddhartha Banerjee, Zhengjian Lv, John D Hulleman, Jagadish Hindupur, Li-Kai Lin and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular neurodegeneration, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Liquid-liquid phase separation and conformational strains ofFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Natalie LandeckBrain Repair and Imaging in Neural Systems, Department of Experimental Medical Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Katherine E StrathearnDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Daniel YsselsteinDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Kerstin BuckBrain Repair and Imaging in Neural Systems, Department of Experimental Medical Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Sayan DuttaDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Siddhartha BanerjeeDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Zhengjian LvDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
John D HullemanDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Jagadish HindupurDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Li-Kai LinSchool of Materials Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Sonal PadalkarSchool of Materials Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Lia A StanciuSchool of Materials Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Yuri L LyubchenkoDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Deniz KirikBrain Repair and Imaging in Neural Systems, Department of Experimental Medical Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. deniz.kirik@med.lu.se.
Jean-Christophe RochetDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA. jrochet@purdue.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6484-1541
Purdue University West Lafayette · USLund University · SEUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · USGoleta Engineering (United States) · USIowa State University · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

Protein Self-Assembly into NanoaggregatesR01GM096039 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI LYUBCHENKO, YURI L · 2011 to 2018
$2.9M
Membrane binding and aggregation of alpha-synucleinR01NS049221 · NINDS · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI ROCHET, JEAN-CHRISTOPHE · 2006 to 2009
$960k
Metal-Induced Structural Transformations during Alpha-Synuclein Aggregation.K25NS058395 · NINDS · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI STANCIU, LIA · 2008 to 2012
$814k
European Research Council 242932NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM096039NINDS NIH HHS K25 NS058395NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS049221
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundα-Synuclein (aSyn) aggregation is thought to play a central role in neurodegenerative disorders termed synucleinopathies, including Parkinson's disease (PD). Mouse aSyn contains a threonine residue at position 53 that mimics the human familial PD substitution A53T, yet in contrast to A53T patients, mice show no evidence of aSyn neuropathology even after aging. Here, we studied the neurotoxicity of human A53T, mouse aSyn, and various human-mouse chimeras in cellular and in vivo models, as well as their biochemical properties relevant to aSyn pathobiology.

methodsPrimary midbrain cultures transduced with aSyn-encoding adenoviruses were analyzed immunocytochemically to determine relative dopaminergic neuron viability. Brain sections prepared from rats injected intranigrally with aSyn-encoding adeno-associated viruses were analyzed immunohistochemically to determine nigral dopaminergic neuron viability and striatal dopaminergic terminal density. Recombinant aSyn variants were characterized in terms of fibrillization rates by measuring thioflavin T fluorescence, fibril morphologies via electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy, and protein-lipid interactions by monitoring membrane-induced aSyn aggregation and aSyn-mediated vesicle disruption. Statistical tests consisted of ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons post hoc test and the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by a Dunn's multiple comparisons test or a two-tailed Mann-Whitney test.

resultsMouse aSyn was less neurotoxic than human aSyn A53T in cell culture and in rat midbrain, and data obtained for the chimeric variants indicated that the human-to-mouse substitutions D121G and N122S were at least partially responsible for this decrease in neurotoxicity. Human aSyn A53T and a chimeric variant with the human residues D and N at positions 121 and 122 (respectively) showed a greater propensity to undergo membrane-induced aggregation and to elicit vesicle disruption. Differences in neurotoxicity among the human, mouse, and chimeric aSyn variants correlated weakly with differences in fibrillization rate or fibril morphology.

conclusionsMouse aSyn is less neurotoxic than the human A53T variant as a result of inhibitory effects of two C-terminal amino acid substitutions on membrane-induced aSyn aggregation and aSyn-mediated vesicle permeabilization. Our findings highlight the importance of membrane-induced self-assembly in aSyn neurotoxicity and suggest that inhibiting this process by targeting the C-terminal domain could slow neurodegeneration in PD and other synucleinopathy disorders.

Indexed as

Protein Aggregation, Pathologicalalpha-SynucleinAnimalsHumansMiceNeuronsRatsRats, Sprague-Dawleyalpha-SynucleinAdeno-associated virusAggregationAlpha-synucleinAmyloidFibrilMembraneNeurodegenerationParkinson’s diseasePhospholipidSynucleinopathy

Identifiers

PMID32900375
PMCPMC7487555
OpenAlexW3084325168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.