ArticleBMC genomics2020
ComHapDet: a spatial community detection algorithm for haplotype assembly.
Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- GCphase: an SNP phasing method using a graph partition and error correction algorithm.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Pairwise comparative analysis of six haplotype assembly methods based on users' experience.BMC genomic data · 2023Article
- flopp: Extremely Fast Long-Read Polyploid Haplotype Phasing by Uniform Tree Partitioning.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2022Article
- Genomics and functional genomics in Leishmania and Trypanosoma cruzi: statuses, challenges and perspectives.Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz · 2021Review
- Selected Research Articles from the 2019 International Workshop on Computational Network Biology: Modeling, Analysis, and Control (CNB-MAC).BMC genomics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHaplotypes, the ordered lists of single nucleotide variations that distinguish chromosomal sequences from their homologous pairs, may reveal an individual's susceptibility to hereditary and complex diseases and affect how our bodies respond to therapeutic drugs. Reconstructing haplotypes of an individual from short sequencing reads is an NP-hard problem that becomes even more challenging in the case of polyploids. While increasing lengths of sequencing reads and insert sizes helps improve accuracy of reconstruction, it also exacerbates computational complexity of the haplotype assembly task. This has motivated the pursuit of algorithmic frameworks capable of accurate yet efficient assembly of haplotypes from high-throughput sequencing data.
resultsWe propose a novel graphical representation of sequencing reads and pose the haplotype assembly problem as an instance of community detection on a spatial random graph. To this end, we construct a graph where each read is a node with an unknown community label associating the read with the haplotype it samples. Haplotype reconstruction can then be thought of as a two-step procedure: first, one recovers the community labels on the nodes (i.e., the reads), and then uses the estimated labels to assemble the haplotypes. Based on this observation, we propose ComHapDet - a novel assembly algorithm for diploid and ployploid haplotypes which allows both bialleleic and multi-allelic variants.
conclusionsPerformance of the proposed algorithm is benchmarked on simulated as well as experimental data obtained by sequencing Chromosome 5 of tetraploid biallelic Solanum-Tuberosum (Potato). The results demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed method and that it compares favorably with the existing techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.