Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32900336›Full record

Trial reportCritical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine2020

Sodium bicarbonate therapy for metabolic acidosis in critically ill patients: a survey of Australian and New Zealand intensive care clinicians.

Ary Serpa Neto, Tomoko Fujii, Khaled El-Khawas, Andrew Udy, Rinaldo Bellomo

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Metabolic acidosis and sodium bicarbonate therapy in critically ill patients: A multinational survey of international and Chinese practitioners.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Protocol summary and statistical analysis plan for the sodium bicarbonate for metabolic acidosis in the intensive care unit (SODa-BIC) trial.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ary Serpa NetoAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre; Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. ary.serpaneto@monash.edu.
Tomoko FujiiAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre; Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Khaled El-KhawasAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre; Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Andrew UdyAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre; Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Rinaldo BellomoAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre; Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
The Alfred Hospital · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUJikei University School of Medicine · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo help shape the design of a future double blind placebo-controlled randomised clinical trial of bicarbonate therapy for metabolic acidosis, based on opinions of intensive care clinicians in Australia and New Zealand.

designAn online survey was designed, piloted and distributed electronically to members of the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group (ANZICS CTG) mailing list. The survey sought to collect information about choice of placebo, method of bicarbonate administration, and acid-base monitoring.

main outcome measuresResponses to six questions in the following domains were sought: 1) solution to be used as placebo; 2) method of administration; 3) target of the intervention; 4) timing of arterial blood gases to monitor the intervention; 5) duration of therapy; and 6) rate of bolus therapy (if selected as the best option).

resultsOne in every eight ANZICS CTG members completed the survey (118/880, 13.4%). Compound sodium lactate was the preferred solution for placebo (54/118, 45.8%), and continuous infusion of bicarbonate (80/118, 67.8%) was the most frequently selected method of administration. A pH > 7.30 was the preferred target (50/118, 42.4%), while monitoring with arterial blood gas analysis every 2 hours until the target is reached and then every 4 hours was the most favoured option (40/118, 33.9%). The preferred duration of therapy was until the target is achieved (53/118, 44.9%).

conclusionsThis survey offers important insights into the preferences of Australian and New Zealand clinicians in regards to any future randomised controlled trial of bicarbonate therapy for metabolic acidosis in the critically ill.

Indexed as

AcidosisAustraliaCalciumCritical CareCritical IllnessDouble-Blind MethodHumansNew ZealandSodium BicarbonateSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeCalciumSodium Bicarbonate

Identifiers

PMID32900336
PMCPMC10692515
OpenAlexW3085754638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.