ArticleCritical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine2020
A pilot study of high frequency accelerometry-based sedation and agitation monitoring in critically ill patients.
Article in Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research progress in agitation early warning monitoring and new technologies for critically ill patients: a narrative review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Personalizing ICU liberation for critically Ill children: shaping the future of the ABCDEF bundle.Current opinion in pediatrics · 2025Review
- Comparison of Quantium Consciousness Index and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: An Observational Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe degree of sedation or agitation in critically ill patients is typically assessed with the Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS). However, this approach is intermittent and subject to unrecognised variation between assessments. High frequency accelerometry may assist in achieving a quantitative and continuous assessment of sedation while heralding imminent agitation.
designWe undertook a prospective, observational pilot study.
settingAn adult tertiary intensive care unit in Melbourne, Australia.
participants20 patients with an admission diagnosis of trauma.
main outcome measuresAccelerometers were applied to patients' wrists and used to continuously record patient movement. Video data of patient behaviour were simultaneously collected, and observers blinded to accelerometry data were adjudicated the RASS score every 30 seconds. Exploratory analyses were undertaken.
resultsPatients were enrolled for a median duration of 9.7 hours (interquartile range [IQR], 0-22.8) and a total of 160 hours. These patients had a median RASS score of 0 (IQR, -4 to 0). A 2-minute moving window of amplitude variance was seen to reflect contemporaneous fluctuations in motor activity and was proportional to the RASS score. Furthermore, the moving window of amplitude variance was observed to spike immediately before ≥ 2 point increases in the RASS score.
conclusionsWe describe a novel approach to the analysis of wrist accelerometry data in critically ill patients. This technique not only appears to provide novel and continuous information about the depth of sedation or degree of agitation, it is also notable in its aptitude to anticipate impending transitions to higher RASS values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32900331PMC10699079What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.