ArticleCancers2020
pT1 Colorectal Cancer Detected in a Colorectal Cancer Mass Screening Program: Treatment and Factors Associated with Residual and Extraluminal Disease.
Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04821258 (Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effect of the Nutraceutical "MICODIGEST 2.0" on the Complications After Surgery With Curative Intent for Colorectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effect of the Nutraceutical "MICODIGEST 2.0" on the Complications After Surgery With Curative Intent for Colorectal Cancer
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interobserver variability of histopathological assessment in pT1 colorectal carcinoma.Histopathology · 2026Article
- Clinical Evaluation of PolyDeep, A Computer-Aided Detection System: A Multicenter Randomized Tandem Colonoscopy Trial.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- How secure can we expect the surveillance policies to be after the implementation in T1 polyps with carcinoma?World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Overtreatment in nonmalignant lesions detected in a colorectal cancer screening program: a retrospective cohort study.BMC cancer · 2021Article
- Depth of submucosal invasion vs. Haggitt level as prognostic predictors of pedunculated‑type early‑stage colorectal cancer removed by endoscopic resection.Medicine internationalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this study is to describe the treatment of pT1 colorectal cancer (CRC) in a mass screening program, the surgery-related complications and the factors associated with residual disease after endoscopic resection and extraluminal disease after surgery. We included in this retrospective analysis all the pT1 CRC detected in the Galician CRC screening program between May 2013 and June 2019. We determined which variables were independently associated with the outcomes of the study through a multivariable logistic regression analysis. We included 370-354 pT1 N0(X), 16 pT1N1- out of the 971 CRC detected; 277 (74.9%) were resected endoscopically and 162 (43.8%) were not referred to surgery. There were surgical complications in 30.7% and 16.3% of the patients during hospitalization and after discharge. Residual disease was detected in 12 (4.3%) after endoscopic resection and extraluminal disease in 18 (8.6%) patients after surgery. The variables independently associated with initial endoscopic resection were a pedunculated morphology (OR 33.1, 95% CI 4.3-254), a diameter ≥ 20 mm (OR 3.94, 95% CI 1.39-11.18) and a Site-Morphology-Size-Access score < 9 (OR 428, 95% CI 42-4263). The variables related with surgery rescue were a piecemeal resection (OR 4.48, 95% CI 1.48-13.6), an infiltrated/nonevaluable resection border (OR 7.44, 95% CI 2.12-26.0), a non-well-differentiated histology (OR 4.76, 95% CI 1.07-20.0), vascular infiltration (OR 8.24, 95% CI 2.72-25.0) and a Haggitt 4 infiltration of the submucosa (OR 5.68, 95% CI 2.62-12.3). Residual disease after endoscopic resection was associated with an infiltrated/nonevaluable resection border (OR 34.9, 95% CI 4.08-298), a non-well-differentiated histology (OR 6.67, 95% CI 1.05-50.0), and the vascular infiltration of the submucosa (OR 7.61, 95% CI 1.55-37.4). The variables related with extraluminal disease after surgical resection were no endoscopic resection (OR 4.34, 95% CI 1.26-14.28), a non-well-differentiated histology (OR 4.35, 95% CI 1.39-14.29) and the lymphatic infiltration of the submucosa (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.32-17.8). In a CRC screening program, although most of pT1 CRC are candidates for endoscopic treatment, surgery is a safe procedure. We have defined some easy to evaluate variables that can be used in the decision-making process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.