Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32899861›Full record

ArticleNutrients2020

A Humanities-Based Explanation for the Effects of Emotional Eating and Perceived Stress on Food Choice Motives during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Wan Shen, Lucy M Long, Chia-Hao Shih, Mary-Jon Ludy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wan ShenFood and Nutrition Program, Department of Public and Allied Health, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9137-3245
Lucy M LongCenter for Food and Culture, 550 West Wooster St, Bowling Green, OH 43402, USA.
Chia-Hao ShihDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606, USA.
Mary-Jon LudyFood and Nutrition Program, Department of Public and Allied Health, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7887-255X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perceived stress affects emotional eating and food choices. However, the extent to which stress associates with food choice motives is not completely understood. This study assessed whether emotional eating mediates the associations between perceived stress levels and food choice motives (i.e., health, mood, convenience, natural content, price, sensory appeal, familiarities, weight control, and ethical concerns) during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic. A total of 800 respondents were surveyed in the United States in June 2020. Their perceived stress, emotional eating, and food choice motives were assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale, Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire, and Food Choice Questionnaire, respectively. Moderate to high levels of perceived stress were experienced by the majority (73.6%) of respondents. Perceived stress was significantly correlated with emotional eating (

Indexed as

AdultAffectBetacoronavirusChoice BehaviorCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Diagnostic Self EvaluationEmotionsFeeding BehaviorFemaleFood PreferencesHumanitiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationCOVID-19emotional eatingfood choice motivesperceived stress

Identifiers

PMID32899861
PMCPMC7551550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.