Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32899857›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Wild Food Plants and Trends in Their Use: From Knowledge and Perceptions to Drivers of Change in West Sumatra, Indonesia.

Lukas Pawera, Ali Khomsan, Ervizal A M Zuhud, Danny Hunter, Amy Ickowitz, Zbynek Polesny

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Ethnobotanical review of traditional use of wild food plants in Japan.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Ethnobotanical study of wild edible fruits in eastern Bhutan.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lukas PaweraFaculty of Tropical AgriSciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 16500 Praha-Suchdol, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-8548-3491
Ali KhomsanDepartment of Community Nutrition, Faculty of Human Ecology, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0001-6101-3583
Ervizal A M ZuhudDepartment of Forest Resources Conservation and Ecotourism, Faculty of Forestry, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia.
Danny HunterAlliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, via dei Tre Denari 472/a, 00054 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4267-595X
Amy IckowitzCenter for International Forestry Research, Bogor 16115, Indonesia.
Zbynek PolesnyFaculty of Tropical AgriSciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 16500 Praha-Suchdol, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-0175-9847

Funding

ALFABET mobility grant for the first author (L.P.) under the Erasmus Mundus Action 2 Programme no numberNeys-van Hoogstraten Foundation Project IN305the Internal Grant Agency of the Faculty of Tropical AgriSciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague (IGA FTZ) Project No. 20205009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wild food plants (WFPs) are often highly nutritious but under-consumed at the same time. This study aimed to document the diversity of WFPs, and assess perceptions, attitudes, and drivers of change in their consumption among Minangkabau and Mandailing women farmers in West Sumatra. We applied a mixed-method approach consisting of interviews with 200 women and focus group discussions with 68 participants. The study documented 106 WFPs (85 species), and Minangkabau were found to steward richer traditional knowledge than Mandailing. Although both communities perceived WFPs positively, consumption has declined over the last generation. The main reasons perceived by respondents were due to the decreased availability of WFPs and changes in lifestyle. The contemporary barriers to consuming WFPs were low availability, time constraints, and a limited knowledge of their nutritional value. The key motivations for their use were that they are free and "unpolluted" natural foods. The main drivers of change were socio-economic factors and changes in agriculture and markets. However, the persistence of a strong culture appears to slow dietary changes. The communities, government and NGOs should work together to optimize the use of this food biodiversity in a sustainable way. This integrated approach could improve nutrition while conserving biological and cultural diversity.

Indexed as

agrobiodiversityethnobotanyfood environmentfood systemsindigenous foodslocal knowledgenutrition and dietswild edible plants

Identifiers

PMID32899857
PMCPMC7555794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.