Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32899675›Full record

ArticleNutrients2020

Effects of Sweet-Liking on Body Composition Depend on Age and Lifestyle: A Challenge to the Simple Sweet-Liking-Obesity Hypothesis.

Vasiliki Iatridi, Rhiannon M Armitage, Martin R Yeomans, John E Hayes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Taste Propensity in Obese and Nonobese Older Adults.Aging medicine (Milton (N.S.W)) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Food Preferences and Obesity.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Vasiliki IatridiSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer BN1 9QH, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9193-0120
Rhiannon M ArmitageSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer BN1 9QH, UK.
Martin R YeomansSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer BN1 9QH, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1436-1483
John E HayesDepartment of Food Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9065-6326
University of Sussex · GBPennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Doctoral School, University of Sussex -Faculty funds - PennState University -World Sugar Research Organization -
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Taste hedonics drive food choices, and food choices affect weight maintenance. Despite this, the idea that hyper-palatability of sweet foods is linked to obesity development has been controversial for decades. Here, we investigate whether interpersonal differences in sweet-liking are related to body composition. Healthy adults aged 18-34 years from the UK (

Indexed as

Age FactorsBody CompositionTasteAdipose TissueAdolescentAdultAnthropometryBody Mass IndexCluster AnalysisDietary SugarsFemaleFood PreferencesHealthy VolunteersHumansLife StyleMaleDietary Sugarsbody-compositiongustatory hedonicsingestive behavioursugarsweet taste

Identifiers

PMID32899675
PMCPMC7551752
OpenAlexW3083575055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.