ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Sit-To-Stand Movement Evaluated Using an Inertial Measurement Unit Embedded in Smart Glasses-A Validation Study.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smartphone-derived joint angular velocities in sit-to-stand motion provide a spatiotemporal marker for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- The STS test and its correlation with common clinical indicators for an Argentinian population sample.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Detection of Gait Events Using Ear-Worn IMUs During Functional Movement Tasks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Validation of Devices for the Five Times Sit To Stand Test: Comparing Plantar Pressure and Head Motion Analysis with Manual Measurement.Yonsei medical journal · 2025Article
- Wearable Technology Applications and Methods to Assess Clinical Outcomes in Foot and Ankle Disorders: Achievements and Perspectives.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- A Clustering-Based Approach to Functional and Biomechanical Parameters Recorded with a Pair of Smart Eyeglasses in Older Adults in Order to Determine Physical Performance Groups.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Validation of the Short Physical Performance Battery via Plantar Pressure Analysis Using Commercial Smart Insoles.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Reliability of Wearable Sensors for Assessing Gait and Chair Stand Function at Home in People With Knee Osteoarthritis.Arthritis care & research · 2023Article
- EarGait: Estimation of Temporal Gait Parameters from Hearing Aid Integrated Inertial Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Applying the UTAUT2 Model to Smart Eyeglasses to Detect and Prevent Falls Among Older Adults and Examination of Associations With Fall-Related Functional Physical Capacities: Survey Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Digital technologies for step counting: between promises of reliability and risks of reductionism.Frontiers in digital health · 2023Article
- Smart Eyeglasses: A Valid and Reliable Device to Assess Spatiotemporal Parameters during Gait.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The Validity of Wireless Earbud-Type Wearable Sensors for Head Angle Estimation and the Relationships of Head with Trunk, Pelvis, Hip, and Knee during Workouts.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Comparison of Human Interpretation and a Rule-Based Algorithm for Instrumented Sit-to-Stand Test.Annals of geriatric medicine and research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wearable sensors have recently been used to evaluate biomechanical parameters of everyday movements, but few have been located at the head level. This study investigated the relative and absolute reliability (intra- and inter-session) and concurrent validity of an inertial measurement unit (IMU) embedded in smart eyeglasses during sit-to-stand (STS) movements for the measurement of maximal acceleration of the head. Reliability and concurrent validity were investigated in nineteen young and healthy participants by comparing the acceleration values of the glasses' IMU to an optoelectronic system. Sit-to-stand movements were performed in laboratory conditions using standardized tests. Participants wore the smart glasses and completed two testing sessions with STS movements performed at two speeds (slow and comfortable) under two different conditions (with and without a cervical collar). Both the vertical and anteroposterior acceleration values were collected and analyzed. The use of the cervical collar did not significantly influence the results obtained. The relative reliability intra- and inter-session was good to excellent (i.e., intraclass correlation coefficients were between 0.78 and 0.91) and excellent absolute reliability (i.e., standard error of the measurement lower than 10% of the average test or retest value) was observed for the glasses, especially for the vertical axis. Whatever the testing sessions in all conditions, significant correlations (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.