Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32899605›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Dental Adhesive Interfaces Reinforced with Magnetic Nanoparticles: Evaluation and Modeling with Micro-CT versus Optical Microscopy.

Cristian Zaharia, Virgil-Florin Duma, Cosmin Sinescu, Vlad Socoliuc, Izabell Craciunescu, Rodica Paula Turcu, Catalin Nicolae Marin, Anca Tudor, Mihai Rominu, Meda-Lavinia Negrutiu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Endodontic fillings evaluated using en face OCT, microCT and SEM.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Cristian ZahariaSchool of Dental Medicine, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Timisoara, 300070 Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-2424-6924
Virgil-Florin Duma3OM Optomechatronics Group, Faculty of Engineering, "Aurel Vlaicu" University of Arad, 310130 Arad, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-5558-4777
Cosmin SinescuSchool of Dental Medicine, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Timisoara, 300070 Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-5651-7215
Vlad SocoliucCentre for Fundamental and Advanced Technical Research, Laboratory of Magnetic Fluids, Romanian Academy-Timisoara Branch, 300223 Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-0529-1911
Izabell CraciunescuNational Institute for Research and Development of Isotopic and Molecular Technologies, 400293 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Rodica Paula TurcuNational Institute for Research and Development of Isotopic and Molecular Technologies, 400293 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-6355-8381
Catalin Nicolae MarinFaculty of Physics, West University of Timisoara, 300223 Timisoara, Romania.
Anca TudorSchool of Dental Medicine, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Timisoara, 300070 Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-9630-4727
Mihai RominuSchool of Dental Medicine, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Timisoara, 300070 Timisoara, Romania.
Meda-Lavinia NegrutiuSchool of Dental Medicine, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Timisoara, 300070 Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-1126-3944
Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara · RONational Institute for Research and Development of Isotopic and Molecular Technologies · ROPolytechnic University of Timişoara · RORomanian Academy · ROWest University of Timişoara · RO

Funding

European Regional Development Fund BioCell-NanoART Grant POC-A1-A1.1.4-E nr. 30/2016Ministerul Cercetării şi Inovării CNDI-UEFISCDI grant PN-III-P2-2.1-PTE-2016-0181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dental adhesives are used in a wide range of applications, including to place direct composite restorations in frontal or posterior teeth. One of the most frequent causes for the failure of composite resin restorations is microleakages. The first aim of this work is to introduce a new type of self-etched dental adhesive doped with magnetic nanoparticles (MPs) synthetized in the laboratory. The scope is to produce adhesives with a minimized width/thickness to decrease the risk of microleakages. The second aim is to assess the width/thickness of the adhesive layer in all the characteristic areas of the teeth using both the less precise but most common optical microscopy and the more accurate and volumetric micro-Computed Tomography (CT) investigations. Twenty extracted teeth have been divided into four groups: Group 1 includes 'blank' samples with adhesives that are not doped with MPs; Group 2 includes samples with adhesives doped with MPs; Groups 3 and 4 include samples with adhesives doped with MPs that are subjected to an active magnetic field for 5 and 10 min, respectively. Microscopy investigations followed by micro-CT and EDAX are performed on the adhesive. While a rather good agreement is obtained between the microscopy and micro-CT results, the capability of the latter to offer a full volumetric reconstruction of the layer is exploited to analyze the adhesion of the four considered dental materials. Thus, from micro-CT results the graphs of the surface areas as functions of the adhesive layer width are modeled mathematically, as well as the volume of sealants, for each of the four groups. To our knowledge, it is the first time that such a methodology is used. Characteristic parameters are extracted and the ascertainment of the optimal parameter that should be utilized for such assessments is discussed. The study demonstrates the adhesion improvement produced for Groups 3 and 4, where MPs are used. It also concludes that the magnetic field should be applied to the adhesive material for the longest possible exposure time (with a trade-off with the clinical duration of the treatment).

Indexed as

adhesive layer thicknessdental adhesivemagnetic nanoparticlesmicro-CTmodelingmulti-parametric analysisoptical microscopy

Identifiers

PMID32899605
PMCPMC7557443
OpenAlexW3082376351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.