Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32899545›Full record

ArticleInsects2020

Ability of

Luca Picciau, Bianca Orrù, Mauro Mandrioli, Elena Gonella, Alberto Alma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. First Report of a Psyllid Vector of 'Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luca PicciauDipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali e Alimentari (DISAFA), University of Torino, I-10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy.
Bianca OrrùDipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali e Alimentari (DISAFA), University of Torino, I-10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy.
Mauro MandrioliDipartimento di Scienze della Vita (DSV), University of Modena e Reggio Emilia, I-41125 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2611-9777
Elena GonellaDipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali e Alimentari (DISAFA), University of Torino, I-10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4779-1300
Alberto AlmaDipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali e Alimentari (DISAFA), University of Torino, I-10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy.
University of Turin · ITUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phytoplasma transmission takes place by insect vectors through an Acquisition Access Period (AAP), Latency Period (LP) and Inoculation Access Period (IAP). Generally, phytoplasmas are believed to be transmitted more efficiently by nymphs because they need a long LP to reach the salivary glands before becoming infective. The transmission can start from adults as well, but in this case a long LP may exceed the insect's lifespan. However, previous evidence has indicated that adults can undergo a shorter LP, even though little knowledge is available regarding the phytoplasma temporal dynamics during this period. Here, we investigate the minimum time required by the phytoplasma to colonize the vector midgut and salivary glands, and finally to be inoculated into a plant. We used the leafhopper

Indexed as

acquisition by adultslatency periodmidgutphytoplasma epidemiologysalivary glandstransmission processvector

Identifiers

PMID32899545
PMCPMC7563877
OpenAlexW3083595249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.