Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32899514›Full record

ReviewNutrients2020

Milk Consumption for the Prevention of Fragility Fractures.

Liisa Byberg, Eva Warensjö Lemming

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Liisa BybergDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Orthopaedics, Uppsala University, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.
Eva Warensjö LemmingDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Orthopaedics, Uppsala University, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0149-452X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Results indicating that a high milk intake is associated with both higher and lower risks of fragility fractures, or that indicate no association, can all be presented in the same meta-analysis, depending on how it is performed. In this narrative review, we discuss the available studies examining milk intake in relation to fragility fractures, highlight potential problems with meta-analyses of such studies, and discuss potential mechanisms and biases underlying the different results. We conclude that studies examining milk and dairy intakes in relation to fragility fracture risk need to study the different milk products separately. Meta-analyses should consider the doses in the individual studies. Additional studies in populations with a large range of intake of fermented milk are warranted.

Indexed as

MilkAgedAnimalsBiasDairy ProductsDietEatingFeeding BehaviorFemaleHip FracturesHumansMaleMeta-Analysis as TopicMiddle AgedOsteoporotic Fracturesbiasdairyfragility fracturehip fracturemilknutritional epidemiologyobservational studies

Identifiers

PMID32899514
PMCPMC7551481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.