Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32899510›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2020

From Land to Water: Taking Fish Welfare Seriously.

Walter Sánchez-Suárez, Becca Franks, Lauri Torgerson-White

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Fish Welfare in Public Aquariums and Zoological Collections.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  2. Improving welfare assessment in aquaculture.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  3. Looking beyond the Shoal: Fish Welfare as an Individual Attribute.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Walter Sánchez-SuárezDepartment of Research, Mercy for Animals, Los Angeles, CA 90046, USA.
Becca FranksDepartment of Environmental Studies, New York University, New York City, NY 10003, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7558-6718
Lauri Torgerson-WhiteDepartment of Research, Mercy for Animals, Los Angeles, CA 90046, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article aims to use contemporary (terrestrial) animal welfare science as a lens to evaluate the state of knowledge concerning welfare in fish species, focusing on farmed fishes. We take advantage of the vast expertise-including previous pitfalls and accomplishments-in the investigation of welfare in terrestrial vertebrates, borrowing questions and methodologies from terrestrial animal welfare science in order to (1) better understand the challenges and opportunities in the study of welfare in fish species, and (2) propose strategies for filling knowledge gaps.

Indexed as

animal welfareaquaculturefish welfarepositive welfare

Identifiers

PMID32899510
PMCPMC7552193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.