ReviewPolymers2020
Scaffolds for Wound Healing Applications.
Review in Polymers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 133 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
133 citing papers in PubMed.
- A double-layer scaffold composed of 3D bioprinted layer of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor and electrospun nanofibers of abietic acid for full thickness skin repair.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Article
- Advancements in Functional Polymeric Scaffolds for Scar-Free Skin Regeneration.Polymer science & technology (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Wound Healing Potential of Multifunctional Nanomaterials: Mechanism, Future Prospects, and Challenges.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Article
- Design of Experiment-Assisted Development of Biodegradable Chitosan/Whey Protein Isolate Films as Advanced Pro-Regenerative Wound Dressings.Biomacromolecules · 2026Article
- Empowering Extracellular Vesicle Wound Therapy via Local Drug Delivery Systems: Mechanistic Insights and Advanced Stimuli-Responsive Strategies.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Fibrin-Based Biomaterials in Wound Healing and Soft Tissue Regeneration: Biological Mechanisms and Clinical Applications.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Functional Hybrid Wound Scaffolds for Controlled Drug Delivery and Smart Wound Management: A Decade of Progress.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2026Review
- Molecular and Pharmacokinetic Rationale for the Use ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Unveiling the Antioxidant Profiling, Cytotoxicity and Wound Healing Potential of Biocompatible Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized UsingFood science & nutrition · 2026Article
- Development of a banana stem fiber-reinforced chitosan-xanthan gum wound healing patch loaded with Tridax procumbens extract for biomedical applications.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Stimuli-responsive hydrogels for radiation-induced skin injury: from passive barriers to autonomous drug delivery systems.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Review
- The Role of a Biological Membrane in Healing Full-Thickness Cutaneous Wounds in Rats.Veterinary medicine international · 2026Article
- Low-detergent sonication decellularization preserves extracellular matrix architecture and enhances cell infiltration in human acellular dermal matrix.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Lipid Microspheres for Topical Delivery of Norfloxacin: Development and Evaluation.Recent advances in drug delivery and formulation · 2026Article
- Chitosan Nanofibrous Dressing Increased Angiogenesis and Anti-inflammatory Response in an Acute Wound Model in Rats: A Comparative Study.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Multiscale interface engineering in biohybrid composites for biomedical applications.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Living bacteria-loaded antibacterial hydrogel-coated gauze: A revolutionary solution for multi-drug-resistant bacterial infections.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Xylitol Modification of Electrospun Polymer Scaffolds: Impact on Physicochemical and Antibacterial Properties.Polymers · 2025Article
- Biocompatible and antibacterial co-electrospun tragacanth gum and polyaniline nanofibers for skin tissue engineering.Scientific reports · 2025Article
73 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In order to overcome the shortcomings related to unspecific and partially efficient conventional wound dressings, impressive efforts are oriented in the development and evaluation of new and effective platforms for wound healing applications. In situ formed wound dressings provide several advantages, including proper adaptability for wound bed microstructure and architecture, facile application, patient compliance and enhanced therapeutic effects. Natural or synthetic, composite or hybrid biomaterials represent suitable candidates for accelerated wound healing, by providing proper air and water vapor permeability, structure for macro- and microcirculation, support for cellular migration and proliferation, protection against microbial invasion and external contamination. Besides being the most promising choice for wound care applications, polymeric biomaterials (either from natural or synthetic sources) may exhibit intrinsic wound healing properties. Several nanotechnology-derived biomaterials proved great potential for wound healing applications, including micro- and nanoparticulate systems, fibrous scaffolds, and hydrogels. The present paper comprises the most recent data on modern and performant strategies for effective wound healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.