Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32899205›Full record

ArticleDentistry journal2020

Information Retrieval and Awareness about Evidence-Based Dentistry among Dental Undergraduate Students-A Comparative Study between Students from Malaysia and Finland.

Pentti Nieminen, Eswara Uma, Sudipta Pal, Marja-Liisa Laitala, Olli-Pekka Lappalainen, Eby Varghese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dentistry journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. E-Professionalism among Dental Students from Malaysia and Finland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pentti NieminenMedical Informatics and Data Analysis Research Group, University of Oulu, 90014 Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-0591-586X
Eswara UmaFaculty of Dentistry, Melaka Manipal Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), 75150 Melaka, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-9042-6707
Sudipta PalFaculty of Dentistry, Melaka Manipal Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), 75150 Melaka, Malaysia.
Marja-Liisa LaitalaResearch Unit of Oral Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, 90014 Oulu, Finland.
Olli-Pekka LappalainenFaculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.
Eby VargheseFaculty of Dentistry, Melaka Manipal Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), 75150 Melaka, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA fundamental skill in education includes the ability to search for, evaluate, and synthesize information, and this cannot be underestimated in dental education. The aim of this study was to assess how dental students from Malaysia and Finland acquire scientific information and to compare their information retrieval skills.

methodsFourth and fifth-year dental students from Malaysia and Finland were invited to participate. A self-administered structured questionnaire including items about the use of information sources, subjective assessment of literature retrieval skills and knowledge was used.

resultsA total of 226 dental students participated in the survey: 131 from Malaysia and 95 from Finland. In both countries, the highest interest for data retrieval among students was found in the oral surgery specialty. The three most used sources of information among Malaysian students were personal lecture notes, dental textbooks, and colleagues; while Finnish students used colleagues, lecture notes, and current clinical guidelines. Students' knowledge of evidence-based practice was inadequate in both student groups. Though the majority of participants reported that they had good or passable skills in literature retrieval, more students from Finland judged themselves to have at least good skills compared to those from Malaysia.

conclusionDental education in both countries includes information retrieval studies and mandatory research projects. However, students did not often use those sources that are considered essential in evidence-based dentistry. Universities should further develop educational and training interventions that guide students to use knowledge resources more effectively for critically appraising scientific evidence.

Indexed as

clinical appraisaldental studentsevidence-based dentistryFinlandliterature retrievalMalaysia

Identifiers

PMID32899205
PMCPMC7558687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.