Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32899060›Full record

ArticleMedicine2020

Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound superb microvascular imaging for lymph nodes: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xuejiao Li, Cong Wang, Xiukun Hou, Ye Tao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xuejiao LiUltrasound department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, China.
Cong Wang
Xiukun Hou
Ye Tao

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs a novel ultrasound technique, superb microvascular imaging can quickly, simply and noninvasively study the microvascular distribution in the tumor and evaluate the microvascular perfusion. Studies suggested that superb microvascular imaging is helpful for the differentiation between benign and malignant lymph nodes. However, the results of these studies have been contradictory. Therefore, the present meta-analysis aimed at determining the accuracy of superb microvascular imaging in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant lymph nodes.

methodsWe will search PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Chinese biomedical databases from their inceptions to the July 30, 2020, without language restrictions. Two authors will independently carry out searching literature records, scanning titles and abstracts, full texts, collecting data, and assessing risk of bias. Review Manager 5.2 and Stata14.0 software will be used for data analysis.

resultsThis systematic review will determine the accuracy of superb microvascular imaging in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant lymph nodes.

conclusionIts findings will provide helpful evidence for the accuracy of superb microvascular imaging in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant lymph nodes. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: INPLASY202070133.

Indexed as

Lymph NodesMicrovesselsUltrasonographyData AccuracyDiagnosis, DifferentialDiagnostic Tests, RoutineHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicSystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID32899060
PMCPMC7478526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.